Does deer hunting create more deer?

Question

How does terrorist hunting create more terrorists?

Answer 1

Deer don't have guns! They don't shoot back!

But your overall point is pretty valid. You fight an enemy in order to defeat them. So killing them is part of the ugly bargain. Fight them hard enough and they will quit. Germany and Japan did.

Answer 2

The basic difference is deer hunters have been more successful than terrorist hunters.

A survey conducted in Europe of baptismal records dating back over 1000 years shows the more threatened people were the more children they have.

This is much like the birth rate spikes in America 9 months after a Hurricane or Earthquake.

Go big Red Go

Answer 3

No, but problem is you can't "talk" another animal into becoming a deer. Terrorists are, brace yourself, human beings. The reason why killing one makes more is that those who survive recruit others into being terrorists. Ever tried to recruit a house cat into being a deer? It doesn't work very well.

Answer 4

Actually, the deer hunting program in Oklahoma has created a more healthy and plentiful deer population. Thanks to the smart management of the Oklahoma Wildlife Bureau.

I have an idea; instead of soldiers we charge hunters a fee and allow them to hunt terrorist. We could have Game Wardens to manage the herd. We could turn this from military operation to a profitable business.

Answer 5

Generally deer have single fawns in the spring but there recently has been a glut of twins and triplets. So yea hunter shoot deer and they produce 2 -3 times what was killed.

Answer 6

you ought to hypothesize that if deer searching grew to become greater restrictive, the deer inhabitants could strengthen at as quickly as in maximum components via fact organic deer predators have been pushed out/eradicated in maximum components. of direction the deer inhabitants could then might desire to plateau faster or later as nutrition availability turns into increasingly greater constrained, given the turning out to be deer inhabitants. as a result what might the age shape interior the deer inhabitants be like? We may even see older persons living longer, jointly as youthful deer are dying via constrained source availability. or possibly the alternative might take place, older persons interior inhabitants dying, and so on. shall we additionally think of with reference to the competition for pals that would ensue if greenbacks are not from now on being killed...could opposition for pals boost or shrink? See the place i'm going with this? there is plenty to think of approximately with reference to this concern.

Answer 7

Interesting analogy. Doesn't really make sense, but some might fall for it. Remember terrorists are people and they have the ability to influence others and thus create more terrorists.

Answer 8

how can you compare deer hunting with something that the bush adminastrion have destroyed like killing terrorists they have nothing in common kill a deer kill a terrorist atleast with the deer you can feed your family but when you kill a terrorist the government put you in jail

Answer 9

Let's see: people have been hunting deer for thousands of years, yet they still exist. Using your analogy, we can count on terrorism for millinia to come. Excellent strategy.

Answer 10

When you shoot a deer and it splits in half, both halves can carry on independantly from one another. So, whereas you started with one deer, you now have two.

The same goes for terrorists.

At least that's what a Democrat told me.