English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-23 09:05:20 · 15 answers · asked by omnimog 4 in Politics & Government Politics

note Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy all ENDED conflicts that were started by Repugs

2006-10-23 11:30:54 · update #1

15 answers

Not exactly right you forgot old CUT AND RUN Nixon he was a republican.

2006-10-23 09:10:40 · answer #1 · answered by Chuck P 3 · 2 1

Don't read history much do you?

WWI - Woodrow Wilson (D)
WWII - Franklin Roosevelt (D)
Korea - Harry Truman (D)
Vietnam - John Kennedy (D) (Nixon actually got us out but still took the wrath of the left.)
Grenada - Ronald Reagan (R) Wait, he finished it up. in 48 hours.
Cold War - Harry Truman
Gulf War I - GHW Bush (R) Ironically, it was his son who finished that war (we occupied it by air for 12 years) and started another.
Iraq - OK, a democrat might withdraw us from that but will that end the trouble or make it worse? Those pages still have to be written.

2006-10-23 09:16:24 · answer #2 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 1 1

Once again dems want to re-write history. WWI-Wilson a democrat, WWII-Roosevelt a democrat, Vietnam-Kennedy, Johnson both democrat, Bosnia-slick willy--read a history book instead of the lies you democrats put out.

2006-10-23 09:17:18 · answer #3 · answered by slodana2003 4 · 0 0

enable's positioned it this way, W is the in difficulty-free words international chief to diminish taxes and flow to conflict. Ever. Tax decrease and spend can in difficulty-free words outcome in larger taxes in the destiny. How else will you pay for it?? playstation - when you consider that Bush has been in workplace, believe fund children and folk making over a million million money have seen their tax burden decreased. yet those who somewhat paintings for his or her money like medical doctors or laywers who make $three hundred,000 - 600,00 have seen their tax burdens strengthen below Bush. they are probable no longer hurting for money, yet why no longer tax each and every of the wealthy? because Bush called the elite "his voting base" in a speech before he replaced into elected. verify it out in the e book there is no loose Lunch.

2016-12-05 03:45:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam?

2006-10-23 09:23:08 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 0

once again a twisted dummycrat blames the republicans for starting wars when it has been the dummycrats that got us into the most wars. Look at the real history and do not be content to read the DNC newsletters.

2006-10-23 09:08:39 · answer #6 · answered by mr conservative 5 · 3 3

That's the way the cookie crumbles. We have PEACE under a Democrat and anything but that under a Repub. Same old same old.

2006-10-23 09:09:48 · answer #7 · answered by Tommy D 5 · 1 3

Oh yeah, you're right on top of it. Just like Korea and Viet Nam???

2006-10-23 09:37:01 · answer #8 · answered by gimpalomg 7 · 0 1

Stalin got us into wars too. He was a Democrat.

2006-10-23 09:14:58 · answer #9 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 1 1

And up the debt, takes Dem's to control the rant and want of the weak.

2006-10-23 09:08:36 · answer #10 · answered by edubya 5 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers