English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Could anyone else have gain enough access to set up the explosives needed to bring down those towers at freefall speed?

don't blame me - blame the laws of physics.

2006-10-23 08:52:37 · 27 answers · asked by orangeontherocks 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

27 answers

And they had teams working on planting them everynight for 100 or more nights. They then swore all of the people involved to silence, and there were hundreds of them, including the security guards and maintenance men in the building who would have noticed the elevators being used.

The gained access to all those private and government offices, each with its own burglar alarm and removed sheetrock and ceiling tiles. Then even more miraculously replaced them and cleaned up the mess without anyone being any the wiser.

I don't blame you, I blame your parents for not making sure you received any education before leaving school and moving back into their basement.

Your theory is just that, a theory. Not a single theory has been able to provide a single piece of evidence; they just pose conjecture. And your physics is wrong, the building collapsed just as fast as any lift-slab construction accident. Once the first floor fails the weight of it and everything above it comes down with the force being transmitted through the steel beams weakening everything as it goes.

The way Washington can't keep secrets what makes you think something along the scale which this would involve could be kept under wraps?

Why does the truth that terrorists exist scare you so much?

2006-10-23 09:20:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

And tell me. What makes WTC can't fall at freefall speed? The building is collapsing, collapsing in such way that you should know by common sense that it IS a freefall.

The heat in the tower was as high as 1000C, and the melting point of steel are only a bit higher than that (I don't remember the exact number, but it's around 1500C). This would weaken the steel column. Just imagine how the 'very strong' almost-melted-steel could hold the tower which is 'only' several thousands tons heavy. And we all know by common sense that steel is a very good conductor of heat, the steel weakening would be distributed to the whole steel frame, from top down.

And the answer to your initial question is NO, CIA isn't planting explosives on the WTC. But a question remains though... did CIA planned the plane crash initially?

2006-10-23 09:43:57 · answer #2 · answered by Lie Ryan 6 · 0 1

Because when you make fairly illogical suggestions, you get fairly illogial reactions. Making personal insults is illogical. Calling someone stupid in no way supports your own arguement. However, I would say that the suggestion that the 911 attacks were perpetrated by somebody other than foreign terrorists (which I assume means you're theorizing they were perpetrated by domestic terrorists, or *shock, gasp* you're implying some government conspiracy theory) goes against every scrap of evidence that has been produced about it. There were 19 hijackers involved in 911. I don't think you can really argue about who was on the planes. So the only argument you can really make is who they were working for. The idea that these men would go to their deaths for their religious beliefs is entirely plausible. The Islamic extremist's jihad has already seen many young men go to death as bombers. It's seen as the ultimate sacrifice, for which they will go straight to heaven. The idea that these men went to their deaths for the US government however, is harder to believe. Most of them were foreign nationals for starters. And the countries of their origins (either their birth, or their parents birth) are countries with a strong muslim element which supports the jihad. I don't see any reason why these men would want to sacrifice their lives so that the American gov't would have an excuse to go to war with their own countries. That's illogical. Furthermore, many of the 19 have proven links to previous radical muslim activities. Bin Laden admitted that he was behind the attacks. He and his associates were already being sought by the US on charges of international terrorism, including in connection with the 1998 bombing of American embassies in Africa and the USS Cole in Yemen. It seems fairly conclusive. Now, I've given you a very logical answer, without making an personal insults. Let's see if you'll acknowledge it, or if you're just looking for other conspiracy theorists to come out and say that anyone who believes this is a stupid, gullible sheep being led by the American government.

2016-03-28 05:14:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Perhaps you need to get a greater understanding of physical laws. How many ways are you going to find to ask this nonsensical question? By the way the CIA that you accuse of setting this up, would have been put into place during your beloved Pres. Clinton's administration. How does that fit with your right wing conspiracy theories?

2006-10-23 08:56:45 · answer #4 · answered by Answergirl 5 · 4 3

DEFINITELY A CIA JOB

Most people ignore or forget that Osama is a CIA alumnus.

The real question should be, will the CIA get away with it?

2006-10-23 09:26:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Ye gads another conspiracy theorist or a bored juvenile. Get a life and face reality.

2006-10-24 00:52:51 · answer #6 · answered by teplitz39 2 · 0 0

The Islamo-fascists have gain enough access to fly up the airplane for the twoers. I hope you excuse my Engrish not so good since reading your ungrammatical question.

By the way, you should get your parents to look into putting you in private school to work on your English and logic skills.

2006-10-23 08:56:34 · answer #7 · answered by Steve C 3 · 4 3

C'mon....be realistic......the CIA were barely able to blow up the levees in New Orleans. They don't have the wherewithal to take down two huge buildings.

2006-10-23 09:50:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I'd say they have some idea of what went on that day. They know about everything else that goes down in the world, why would they be exempt from this? And if it turns out they orchestrated it, that wouldnt surprise me either.

2006-10-23 09:02:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

" Thatta' fire Jesi " right on!

Structural Engineers and Architects blame themselves for not seeing into the future of madness...

2006-10-24 19:26:13 · answer #10 · answered by diSota 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers