2006-10-23 08:26:15 · 9 answers · asked by theophilus 5 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
If you mean all the stars, including our own sun, then we would die a deep frozen death. If our sun stays, and just the moon disappears, then no more tidal changes, eclipses, moonlight, etc. The other stars gone would have no effect on us whatsoever.
2006-10-23 08:33:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
well, considering the Sun is a star, we'd all die. No heat, no energy from sunlight, the earth would freeze, all plant and animal life would die. Poof.
Without any stars, there is no possibility of life on earth, or any other planet. However, the idea that all of that mass and energy could just "disappear" is far fetched. The only way that amount of energy could go away (conservation of mass) is if every star managed to get absorbed into a black hole - and if one existed large enough to envelope a star, it would most likely pull in surrounding planets.
BTW - most of the stars we can see at night are actually already gone. The light we see is the very bright light emitted when a star has gone into super nova. These stars were thousands of light years away and we are JUST seeing the immense amount of light emitted during a supernova - so most of those stars, if we could get to them right now, have already blown out. Sort of sad, but true. The universe is constantly changing, but other galaxies are SO far away from ours that they don't really impact us at all.
2006-10-23 08:35:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The earth would go flying into space without the moon and if the stars disappear then I don't thank that it would affect us directly unless your includeing the sun.
2006-10-23 10:18:14 · answer #3 · answered by n/a 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
*Sigh* the certainty is this email is from 2003, keeps resurfacing each twelve months and is the bane of my existance. Mars got here "close" to Earth in 2003. It grew to become into approximately 34,646,418 miles from the Earth. it extremely is greater effective than 34 million miles!! despite the fact that if it extremely is seen "close" in astronomical words. Being so "close" to us, the planet brightened to a -2.9 seen fee. It brightness grew to become into basically 2nd to Venus (top you are able to now see Venus interior the ENE around 5 am interior the constellation of Gemini; Mars contraptions interior the West very quickly after sunset). This "staggering View of Mars which you will by no skill See lower back on your Lifetime" email keeps resurfacing each twelve months. the only way Mars could ever look as great as an entire moon could be if it grew to become into knocked out of its orbit and headed in the direction of us. no longer a happy concept. The comet which impacted the Earth, replaced the climate and at last led to the extinction of the dinosaurs, grew to become into basically 6 miles in diameter. Mars is approximately 4,213 miles in diameter, making it lots greater effective than that comet. Neither Mars nor the Earth could survive a collision of the two planets. even in spite of the undeniable fact that there is not any "staggering, by no skill till now considered and by no skill Will lower back" adventure for Mars this August, pass out and revel interior the night sky besides.
2016-11-25 00:34:14 · answer #4 · answered by guiteres 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
realistically? the stars would do next to nothing, might make it harder to navigate or something. Without the moon nights will be darker and ocean tides won't be nearly as strong
2006-10-23 08:31:37 · answer #5 · answered by suprasteve 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since the sun is a star, we'd freeze to death without its heat.
2006-10-23 08:32:32 · answer #6 · answered by Gene 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The sun is a star. Without the sun we die.
2006-10-23 08:32:49 · answer #7 · answered by DanE 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It would make space really, really boring
2006-10-23 08:27:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
then........wake up......its just a dream
2006-10-23 08:30:05 · answer #9 · answered by manuelcojr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋