2006-10-23 06:40:29 · 25 answers · asked by shu 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I did not vote for BUSH. But too many did and so the majority speaks. I think people were pulled in with his optimism, friendly style, and the fact that he was the son of a President. Just because he is the son of a former President does not mean jack. It only means he is spoiled, spoon fed, given the best education that their money could buy, sheltered, given a superior complex thinking he is better than others, never had to really work a hard job in his life, could avoid long difficult military service, had his family give him everything he owns. If this is not a classic spoiled brat who is?
No one bothered to really look at George W the man. What did he do that was so great. His party (and mine too) stood behind him just to win and keep a Republican in office. All this President cares about is getting into the History books as a War President and the one who was there during the attack on New York. And he will but I also hope he goes down in the History books as the Worst President we have ever had (yes, worst than Clinton and Nixon).
Lets get him out and sent him back to Crawford so he can sit and think about how he ruined this country and spent all our countries money on a senseless war.
Please do reasearch and think before you vote. Study the issues and the men and think outside the Party lines.
2006-10-23 06:50:50 · answer #1 · answered by Nevada Pokerqueen 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I researched the facts and did not voter for him. Those people that voted for him owe the rest of us and the world an apology. Never mind, the damage is done. Too late.
Please vote responsibly the next time. The candidate you elect could do a lot of damage to the country and the world.
2006-10-23 06:45:42 · answer #2 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Can you say fixed election? I dont hate him, and I am a compassionate & tolerant individual, but he has had all the benefits of a wealthy legacy and is not in touch with the average people of this country. I did not vote for him twice and I dont know anyone who did.
2006-10-23 06:51:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The people who hate him did not vote for him.
Fascinating that the people who claim to be "compassionate" and "tolerant" of "diversity" are the same schmucks who spew venom against Bush.
2006-10-23 06:43:04 · answer #4 · answered by C = JD 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I didn't vote for him.
The majority of Americans voted against him in 2000.
Sucks doesn't it?
2006-10-23 06:45:56 · answer #5 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally speaking, I didn't. I voted for the other guy,lol. The lesser of two evils
2006-10-23 06:43:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I didn't vote for him. But as a Christian, I don't hate the sinner, I hate the sin. He started and is prosecuting an unjust war. I hate that.
2006-10-23 06:43:10 · answer #7 · answered by Snowshoe 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I didn't vote for him then, but I would now!
2006-10-23 08:26:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well that's the part that gets people all shirty, isn't it? It turns out that most of us didn't vote for him, as he lost the popular election for both his terms. He's now raped democracy twice.
2006-10-23 06:42:44 · answer #9 · answered by Beardog 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Diebold voted for him.
2006-10-23 06:53:01 · answer #10 · answered by big b 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋