2006-10-23 05:18:54 · 7 answers · asked by Dr.O 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Instead of loosing the War just make a deal with him and problem is over.
2006-10-23 05:21:38 · update #1
With out him you are simply increasing the power and influance of IRAN.
2006-10-23 05:25:40 · update #2
Good question. I don't understand why the US CIA headed by GHW Bush and Rumsfeld and Cheney, who were Saddam Hussein's friends that put him in power and helped him in all his brutality ever went against him in the first place.
Maybe it was because he rejected them in favor of France and wanted to put his oil into the euro currency instead of US dollars, creating a precedent for the demise of the petrodollar. Without oil trading in dollars, the US oil companies would fold.
2006-10-23 05:23:50 · answer #1 · answered by nora22000 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am sorry...I must say this. That is the stupidest dumbest question and statement I have heard to date! Saddam also tortured and terrorized his own people. He would use woodchippers on them putting them in feet first. WOODCHIPPERS!!! And you would have this same villain be placed back into a seat of power?
The miltias and private armies should be dealt with however. These are causing difficulties which are unecessary at this present time.
2006-10-23 12:24:00 · answer #2 · answered by You Ask & I Answer!!! 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So what put a Dictator back in? Destroy any crediabilty we have in that we are TRYING to bring in Democracy? Saddam doesn't "understand" Iraq when it comes to trying to bring in a democracy. He understands how to be a tyrant. Fair enough that is basically what that artifical country, created by Britian following WW1, needs. That isn't what we want to put in place though.
2006-10-23 12:30:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you are suggesting that it was ok for Saddam to kill citizens at will, just for dissent, then, I'm sorry, I don't agree. If that's the kind of "understanding" that you think is good for Iraq, I disagree. If you think the Kurdish genocide was "understanding", then thank GOD you're not President of the United States.
2006-10-23 12:25:38 · answer #4 · answered by sacolunga 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think that it's becoming clearer that the average, non political Iraqi was better off under Saddam than being blown to smithereens by what we broke but couldn't fix.
2006-10-23 12:23:21 · answer #5 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who knew you were this Sadistic.. Obviously you are completely ignorant of Saddam's reign of terror .. The brutality and genocide he committed against his people , the rape rooms little girls were hauled into and continually raped for months..The torture and gassing of the Kurds, UNBELIEVABLE......... What even makes this statement worse is the Liberals that agree with it... You people are sick.. I wonder, do y'all think we should have let Hitler continue his reign of terror also...
To Nora22..... Hussein was in power before Bush was ever elected may want to recheck your facts...
2006-10-23 12:45:09 · answer #6 · answered by bereal1 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
And the bath regime is a western sympathizer, so we know our interestd would be considered as well. But then, we would have to admit failure somewhere, and that doesn't seem likely..
2006-10-23 12:22:10 · answer #7 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋