an animal lover
2006-10-23 04:17:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
No more Bush's....not Hillary,shes an idiot hungry for power & weaker as a woman than people realize ,....not Gore, he's on the edge too much...
heres a few I am checking out...
Barack Obama
Rudy Guiliani
John Mccain
John Edwards
Jim Talent (Mo. Sen.)
not sure all are going to be in it,but still worth checking them out
2006-10-23 11:28:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by *toona* 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I like a Rice/Giuliani ticket for the Republicans.
For the Democrats I like Clinton/Barrack. I want a Republican win; I believe the more exposure Hillary has the less votes she can get (outside NY where most everyone is ultra liberal). Osama Barrack; the new media darling, I saw him on TV the other night, the guy is as exciting as rice cakes.
2006-10-23 11:25:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Michael Savage
2006-10-23 11:17:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Rudy Giuliani
2006-10-23 11:20:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ms Fortune 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Jack Bauer from 24. Unfortunately he does not exist in real life.
2006-10-23 11:21:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by El Pistolero Negra 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Rice versus Clinton.
2006-10-23 11:18:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Clown Knows 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
well, the world has dabbled with the idea of Hillary running for president, but i don't think the US is quite ready for a female president. I'm not sure who I'd run for President from the Democratic party.. there are several choices and I'm still trying to figure out who the strongest candidate could be, but i do think it would be a wonderful idea, and a bold step that the nation could handle to run Hillary for Vice President.
2006-10-23 11:20:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by pip 7
·
0⤊
7⤋
George Bush III
2006-10-23 11:17:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by godoompah 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
I prefer to have anybody as the president except me .
2006-10-23 11:20:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by khayum p 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Let's watch the governor of New Mexico.
2006-10-23 11:19:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by kman1830 5
·
2⤊
3⤋