According to scientists, humans will split into TWO groups. One tall and handsome, the other short and ugly?

Question

Why would God make ugly goblins out of us. Does this prove that there is no God and even if he does exist, he has nothing to with us

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6057734.stm

Answer 1

I don't think it has anything to do with God, what the scientists were saying is that, if tall beautiful people keep on having kids together, and smaller less beautiful people do the same, then their kids will inherit their genes and so their tallness and beauty! Just because a scientist says something doesn't mean its correct, and also, this is a generalization, and human beings do not always find the same kind of people as themselves attractive. The report also suggested that all people will be coffee coloured due to mixing races, but I would have thought that while this may be the generality it is unlikely to be universal. I think that a lot of these reports should be taken for their novelty value rather than as a likely outcome.

Answer 2

the dissimilar issues he says are spot on- like that persons could have espresso coloured dermis- completely nicely suited- and this guy is a respected scientist via many people, so i assume alot of persons think of what's says is actual. Me individually- i decrease value as good judgment something revealed interior the on a daily basis mail newspaper because of the fact they have an inclination to be oppressive in terms of sophistication, gender, way of existence, faith etc. final week a vacationing scientist grew to become into banned from doing a verbal exchange right here via a museum- the scientist had a nobel prize for his learn into stem cellular/DNA learn, he had pronounced that he had concluded that black people have been much less clever than white. Which good judgment defines thats utter rubbish-so theres continuously some loopy scientist around, too a lot blending with chemical ingredients in labs can impact the suggestions thats what i say.

Answer 3

No reasonable scientist would ever make such a ridiculous prediction.

Journalists, on the other hand, because they are already a lower form of life and not sufficiently literate to read a scientific paper will produce such nonsense on a regular basis.

God has nothing to do with evolution.

It is not possible to prove there is no god, neither is it possible to prove that god does exist (quotations from various "holy books" are not proof of anything beyond the quoters gullibility)

If in doubt, apply Occams razor

Answer 4

The point of view from Oliver Curry is interesting but I think that we have to wait opinions from other evolutionary scientists to prove his argument.

I firmly believe in evolution but we do not know what will be the future enviromental and social conditions.

In the past there was other theories affirming how the appearance of human beings will be and I guess there will be much more in the years to come.

If Curry is right, my descendants will be of the short type. I am writing you from not a very favoured country. I write you from Mexico.

Answer 5

It was only one scentist who was being sponsored by the Bravo channel who said this. It probably sounds plausible if you come home at midnight with a skinful of wifebeater and the remains of a rancid kebab down your shirt to watch bollox on telly. The Bravo channel was made for just such an event as this.

Answer 6

That is so lame. beauty is in the eye of the beholder - but its also a matter of opinion. NO ONE IS BORN UGLY! We assess people based on cultural ideas of what constitutes beauty.

in the 1700's - women of heft were the "hot mamaseetah's" of the day and all others were skinny tooth picks and undesirable.

Trust me - somewhere are people who think you are ugly and somewhere someone things you are hot. beauty (or handsomeness) is in the eye of the beholder - AND - a matter of opinion - NOT a factual state in either case - hot or not..., its not.

Answer 7

its just speculation not all tall people are handsone and not all small people are ugle. Plus you have to account for people with Disabilities re producing. I am afraid once again it scientists with too much time on hands making things up that sound good

Answer 8

This has happened before when we were evolving from monkeys. Homo erectus ( an early form of man ) evolved into two species. Neanderthal man and the earliest homo sapiens ( modern man ) . It is thought neanderthal man could of been made extinct by the larger homo sapien 40000 years ago.

Answer 9

Gene flow will prevent this. Plus, short women are more successful at finding mates than tall women.

Answer 10

The theory is crap and self contradictory, it says that humans will live upto the age of 120 years, and then later also states that they will have weak immune systems? what the f.....?