Why have British governments been hell bent on increasing inequalities in the population? This is mainly through the agency of migration. Professional wages have increased two fold and the manual and clerical population have had relative reductions.
2006-10-23 02:55:30 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Should the real question be: Does it matter who is Primeminister?
The fact is that no matter who the Primeminister is all decisions have to go through parliment, so is it a new fresh faced new idea parliment that this country need rather that a new Primeminister....
Get the rich out of Parliment and some good hard workers in, that will solve all the problems as none of them do any real hard work in making this country good for everyone who works hard...
2006-10-24 03:05:58 · answer #1 · answered by jojo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The rich get richer and keep the poor down. Blair has been successful with that policy and Cameron will be the same. Immigration is great for them it holds wages very low for the people who need money are the bottom of the pile.
2006-10-23 03:02:41 · answer #2 · answered by deadly 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The 'old boy' network is alive and well - they just favour people from Fettes public school rather than Eton at the moment. Blair has done nothing to make the country any fairer and meritocratic with his quotas.
2006-10-23 04:20:36 · answer #3 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Professional wages have increased whilst blue collar decreased because it is the professional, white collar workers who will vote for New Lobour and the revamped (ha ha) Conservatives.
2006-10-23 03:08:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋