English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Robert David Steele was the second-ranking civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence and also worked for the CIA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_David_Steele

"I am forced to conclude that 9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war, and I am forced to conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indict (not necessarily convict) Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and others of a neo-conservative neo-Nazi coup d'etat to kick-off of the clash of civilizations."

I think If Bush Rove or Cheney were ever in front of a GRAND JURY, they would be toast.
What do you think?

2006-10-23 02:39:26 · 10 answers · asked by big-brother 3 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

I think those ******* Bush and Rove would turn states evidence on Cheney. Cheney on the other hand is so delusional that he would stick to his guns and maybe even try to bring them(his guns) to to court with him.

2006-10-23 02:49:52 · answer #1 · answered by Mario Savio 6 · 1 1

I honestly have greater of an opinion on Bush than Cheney. no one can heavily have faith that Bush advised Cheney what to do. To me it grew to become into glaring that Bush offered out to Cheney and permit the conservative top run the tutor. It grew to become into Cheney in the back of the curtain on each thing. They even bullied the Brits into transforming into a member of the conflict in Iraq/Afganistan. Cheney spent the greater effective component of his term on the CIA searching for information to help the conflict. No different (Vice) President has ever accomplished that. to assert no longer something with reference to the economic crises we've long previous by which I additionally characteristic to Cheney greater effective than the different one individual. Cheney/Bush might have accomplished some issues to get us off the dependence on distant places oil. we've greater organic gasoline interior the U. S. to final the subsequent 2 hundred years. And we nevertheless rigidity automobiles utilising gas. If nevertheless in power we could be offshore drilling interior the Atlantic/Alaska just to maintain the middle of power in oil. The checklist is going on...

2016-11-25 00:04:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think that this is why ALberto Gonzalez, is pushing for a law that will not allow members of this administration to be eligible to be tried for erreors committed in the run up to the war, I think that President Bush making the Supreme Court conservative will pay off for him eventually.

2006-10-23 02:51:04 · answer #3 · answered by Mike Honcho 5 · 0 0

So, because one person has delusions (but no proof) that Bush is the reason for all the ills in the world, that means enough to prosecute them?

Sorry, but I am forced to conclude the guy is a delusional nutjob.

2006-10-23 02:50:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your "question" ignores the fact that Mr. Steele is a far left wing radical, regardless of his experience. The "proof" you have is like having the fox watch the hen house. As I have said, time and again, conspiracy advocates are----well, FREAKS---until they can submit some credible proof of their assertions.

2006-10-23 04:02:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They would be fried and boiled, if there was any real decency in the world

(However, the wikipedia quote will get dismissed, owing to the erratic nature of wiki)

2006-10-23 02:43:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Thanks for the quote. I have to agree with it. And these guys are still around causing more mischief. I think the whole bunch of Bushies might be indicted some day.

2006-10-23 02:54:04 · answer #7 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 0 0

You are just a dumb stupid conspiracy theorist. Get a life, and job. Stop living with your mother. Here's a proved conspiracy theory. The clash of civ's has been going on for a while.
God Bless You

2006-10-23 02:43:05 · answer #8 · answered by the.bedel 1 · 1 2

They'll be toast when they join me down here!!!

2006-10-23 02:55:48 · answer #9 · answered by thumbsdowndevil 3 · 0 0

"I never had sex with that woman."

One of our former presidents testimony to a Grand Jury.

Convictions are based on facts, not opinions.

2006-10-23 02:43:19 · answer #10 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers