English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-23 01:34:57 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Movies

7 answers

In July 2000, director Ridley Scott said that Deckard is, in fact, a replicant.

but.....

Harrison Ford takes issue with Ridley Scott's revelation that Deckard is a replicant. "We had agreed that he definitely was not a replicant," Ford said.

2006-10-23 02:39:32 · answer #1 · answered by snewrtz 2 · 0 0

All the replicants had super strength in the movie. Deckard didn t. He was constantly beat up by all.

2015-08-17 12:08:21 · answer #2 · answered by Charles 1 · 0 0

No, but the question posed by the film is whether a machine that wants to be human is more human than a man who loses his humanity.

2006-10-23 01:37:38 · answer #3 · answered by rosbif 7 · 0 0

yes, he is. watch the special edition of the dvd. those memories of the horse running throught the water were implants. Ridley Scott answered this question on Film '99 (or whatever year it was). try to contact BBC to confirm this.

2006-10-23 09:19:43 · answer #4 · answered by kiss666 1 · 0 0

Human as I remember

2006-10-23 01:54:54 · answer #5 · answered by devora k 7 · 0 0

This is a long-running debate. Does it make a difference what the "right" answer is?

2006-10-23 05:10:29 · answer #6 · answered by Adoptive Father 6 · 0 1

That was something that was hinted at, but I believe he was human.

2006-10-23 01:39:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers