The subjective terms First World, Second World, and Third World, can be used to divide the nations of Earth into three broad categories.
Third World is a term first coined in 1952 by French demographer Alfred Sauvy on the model of Sieyès's declaration concerning the Third Estate during the French Revolution: "...because at the end this ignored, exploited, scorned Third World like the Third Estate, wants to become something too."
The Third World later became a synonym of these nations that aligned themselves with neither the West nor with the Soviet Bloc during the Cold War. Thus, the Non-Aligned Movement was created after the 1955 Bandung Conference.
2006-10-23 01:38:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
0⤋
The time period "3rd global" used to be honestly coined through economist Alfred Sauvy in an editorial within the French journal L'Observateur of August 14, 1952. It used to be a planned connection with the "Third Estate" of the French Revolution. Tiers monde way 3rd global in French. The time period received standard repute in the course of the Cold War whilst many poorer international locations followed the class to explain themselves as neither being aligned with NATO or the USSR, however rather composing a non-aligned "3rd global" (on this context, the time period "First World" used to be mostly understood to intend the United States and its allies within the Cold War, which might have made the East bloc the "Second World" through default; nevertheless, the latter time period used to be seldom honestly used). These websites supply well expertise and motives.
2016-09-01 01:18:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by liebermann 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
"The term is frequently used to denote nations with a low UN Human Development Index (HDI), independent of their political status (meaning that the PRC, Russia and Cuba, all of which were very strongly aligned during the Cold War, are often termed third world). However, there is no objective definition of Third World or "Third World country" and the use of the term remains common. Some in academia see it as being out of date, colonialist, othering and inaccurate; its use has continued, however. In general, Third World countries are not as industrialized or technologically advanced as OECD countries, and therefore in academia, the more politically correct term to use is "developing nation"."
2006-10-23 01:36:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by i have no idea 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
this term is popularly defined -- and yes it has many definitions depending on the connect and the context of the speech. but one understanding is the countries that fall in between the "haves and have not's" -- economically speaking, i.e. wealth. later on it meant to define many other versions around the theme economics, politics, social, human rights and more.
2006-10-23 02:17:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by s t 6
·
0⤊
0⤋