English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-23 01:20:26 · 29 answers · asked by not_prfikt 7 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

29 answers

Beyond any shadow of doubt, oh, yes. And didn't you just love the Johny Cocran line "If it doesn't fit, you must aquit". The leather glove was blood soaked, and then washed. Of course it shrank, but the idiotic jury was too stupid to get it, and the prosecution not the sharpest tools in the shed. After the trial when photos came out of him wearing shoes he claimed he never owned,---shoes that left prints at the scene---- oh, yes. a chicher..... guilty? beyond all reasonable doubt became an absolute certainty.

2006-10-23 01:24:10 · answer #1 · answered by April 6 · 2 0

I still have my doubts. There were too many contradictions said regarding the case. The property was searched the first time and nothing was found. The second time the property was searched then all of a sudden the evidence was there. That detective who handled the case was known to lie about other cases that he solved. But, then again it was said that the detective had found evidence to solve other cases. And the glove was found by the detective during the second search. Did the glove fit him?? Was he jealous because Nicole would not go out with him?
I'm sorry this is how I feel. I have mixed feelings of everything that was said in the court hearings. Alot of things didn't add up and it confused me.

2006-10-23 08:53:03 · answer #2 · answered by Dottie 6 · 0 0

Yes.
In one episode of In The Heat of The Night - O.J. has a role, where he was killed.. with the same tool (a camping saw), and his throat was cut, almost severing it.. just like that of his real wife. They didn't allow this show to be viewed during the time of his trial, but shortly after it was finished, it aired.
I'm sorry that he's able to walk the streets.. in my eyes, he's guilty.

2006-10-23 08:43:02 · answer #3 · answered by sassy 6 · 1 0

Definately

2006-10-23 09:22:40 · answer #4 · answered by dailybmine 5 · 1 0

At this point, all I can do is feel so sorry for his children, and Nicoles family, Paula, and those whos lives will never be the same..or left alone.
Sometime, there are worse things than being dead..like having to live with the fact everyone thinks your dad killed your mom..poor kids!

2006-10-23 08:24:27 · answer #5 · answered by kat k 5 · 2 0

Yes,it was later proven he did it.That's why he owes the Brown family 1.7 million dollars,none of which he has paid.

2006-10-23 08:53:04 · answer #6 · answered by Celebrity girl 7 · 1 0

Ten years later and you still don't know he did it? Yes. Si. Wee. Ya. Guilty, except in California.

2006-10-23 08:24:25 · answer #7 · answered by barkel76 4 · 1 0

Yes, I believe that OJ is a guilty man that was set free because he had great attorneys. I pray for his salvation.

2006-10-23 08:24:39 · answer #8 · answered by Just me. 4 · 1 1

Absolutely!!!

2006-10-23 08:28:08 · answer #9 · answered by Dove 5 · 1 0

Absolutely, OR he paid Kado his kiddo to do it! Why else would that BOY be living with OJ for free? Hmmmmm......? LOL

2006-10-23 08:24:24 · answer #10 · answered by Life after 45 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers