If speaking in the same context, what is the relationship of subject and object? For example "the subject and object of the nature of wisdom". Thanks.
2006-10-23 00:13:59 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
jghfyti i dmslk kkd djfhv kiw jdkjfknvgrk o jd k jsdcjdfv
2006-10-23 00:18:23 · answer #1 · answered by dimitrakavoukopoulou 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The first part of your question is easy. The subject is the actor, as in "the boy runs", the boy being the subject. The object is what the action refers to, as in "the boy runs home", 'home' being the object of his running.
But when you give something like" the subject and object of the nature of wisdom" a bit more context would help.
Grammatically, the subject would "nature(of wisdom), the object would be whatever the subject referred to as "the nature of wisdom", but it stands, it's too esoteric for me. The phrase almost seems to make the subject and object the same (without any other context given), as in "the subject and object of the nature of wisdom is 'man' or 'God' or something of that nature.
In that case I suppose they could be the same thing.
I'm hoping you have more context than the one phrase ou have given, and that this helps you work it out.
2006-10-23 00:50:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all thank you for writing a good question, you made my day.
The subject is the individual, the object is the situation.
In your own example the subject would be an individual take on the nature of wisdom. The Object in such a case would be something akin to a platonic ideal. it would be the actual nature of wisdom which the subject's understanding could be compared to to know how accurate the subjects understanding was.
I hope that answers some of your question if not please ask for more info or clarification.
2006-10-23 06:17:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
This is a very interesting question. I believe linguists have answered this question in the following way.
How does a phrase function grammatically within a sentence? In English, the subject of a sentence can be defined as a noun phrase that precedes (comes before) a verb phrase. The object of a sentence can be defined as a noun phrase that comes after a verb phrase. (Not all English sentences contain an object.)
So, take the noun phrase "the boys in the classroom" -- this phrase (dependent on its position in a sentence) can be either the subject or the object of the sentence. Thus, "The boys in the classroom were rowdy" is an example of the noun phrase acting as the subject of the sentence. Whereas, "The police arrested the boys in the classroom" is an example of the noun phrase acting as an object of the sentence.
Not all languages have this kind of configuration (Subject Verb Object). In Japanese, for example, the subject of a sentence is marked with the particle -ga.
The fragment you provide ("the subject and object of the nature of wisdom") is a noun phrase. This noun phrase itself can be used either as the subject of a sentence or as the object of a sentence. Thus, as subject -- "The subject and object of the nature of wisdom is to find truth"; as object -- "Philosophers study the subject and object of the nature of wisdom."
2006-10-23 04:53:13 · answer #4 · answered by abbie 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds rather confusing to me. I'll give it a shot.
All I can really say is the subject is what it's about, the object is what it's doing. So, the subject of wisdom is knowledge, the pbject is to teach.
Er, actually, that made no sense. I hope someone else can help more.
2006-10-23 00:22:59 · answer #5 · answered by Aisha C 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
as it is worded
the subject of the nature of wisdom is the discussion of it
the object of the nature of wisdom is an oxymoron
the subject of wisdom is the personal application of it
the object of wisdom is the purpose of it
the small change in wording makes a big change in meaning
2006-10-23 00:53:20 · answer #6 · answered by ewen sinclair 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, but not while modeling! And to answer the other question, in my opinion the artist and the subject can have whatever relationship they want except during working hours. During working hours their only relationship should be that of artist/subject that is it. The subject can voice his/hers opinion afterwards, during breaks, but not on the job without the artist queries. Then I would begin to wonder about the artist for the artist is showing signs or uncertainty, a lack of commitment in their craft.
2016-05-22 00:44:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The subject is viewed from the emotional aspect of our perception. The object is viewed without the emotional nature of our being, as though it were seen from the view point of another instead of ourselves. Wisdom is when we are able to discern the difference.
2006-10-23 00:37:57 · answer #8 · answered by Sweetie Poo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is said nicely in Hindi grammar." kartane Karmko kiya"
Subject achieved the object by doing the work
2006-10-23 01:36:48 · answer #9 · answered by Brahmanda 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am subject to the object. the oobject in my eye is a beautifull lady, and i am subject to her. the subject, is to be studied and figured correctly the object is love... love is completion......object= end......suject= in process--means to an end
2006-10-23 21:07:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋