definatly, he deserves that status, hitler killed jews and gypsies for ethnic cleansing, george bush has killed 650,000+ iraqis for oil.
2006-10-22 20:46:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by the _reporter 1
·
3⤊
5⤋
Yes, he certainly ranks as among the worst leaders to ever rule a great nation. He followed bad advice and failed to prove a strong enough leader to overcome the forces that control international politics towards benefitting the few and towards an agenda that never considers the people.
Hitler was openly a dictator. Bush is one while managing to convince everyone that he is a democratic leader. In truth he has set democracy and liberties back decades.
2006-10-22 21:27:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by stj 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Stalin, Mao, Il, Mugabe, I can think of a lot of evil dictators that would rank much higher even if George Bush was an evil dictator.
And to whoever up there. Hitler made himself fuhrer (dictator) after he was elected.
2006-10-22 20:59:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chris J 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
What a ridiculous idea. The man (Bush) has not been responsible for the predjudiced deaths of 6 million people in his homeland. He has not tried to take over the world. He is doing his job as he sees the need to do it. We hired him to make the tough choices (and to live with them.) He is also considering what will happen in the future years if we let these muslim extremists continue to act without being stopped. It's easy to sit around and ***** about him -instead why not get off your duff and go out and help elect a president you will like better?
2006-10-22 20:59:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by casey54 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Lets see there was Stalin, Po pot, Takamatta, Gengis Khan, Mao, Napolean, Ivan the Terrible. I think if you actually opened a history book, you might find that G. Bush doesn't even hold a candle. You can believe what you want, but you are only lieing to yourself
2006-10-22 20:57:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Much as I dislike the man I do not think that 'evil dictator' is a fitting term.
Arrogant, foolish and bloodthirsty possibly, but sadly he has been democratically elected by the US population and is therefore not a dictator
2006-10-22 21:07:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Vanguard 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
George Bush u can put him at #1
2006-10-22 20:53:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by nau 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Almost there. But he will soon be history ( If he don't declare himself king , he will not get another chance to continue his act at top. )
Hitler was only killing in the neighbouring countries with some kind of justification atleast for his people , which were not seen as lies.
The new age hitler and his mussolini are LIARS before their own people. They kill far away without any apparent reason ( actually for looting )
I think these new guys cannot be equated to Hitler/mussolini actually. These guys are more like pirates .
2006-10-22 20:57:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by jaco 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Absolutely. He is going to go down in history as starting up a war that will takes generations to unravel. He will be blamed for fueling Islamic extremism and the decisions of his administration will be studied years from now as a cautionary tale of what NOT to do. The world is a much more violent and threatening place since Bush took office. His policies have spawned an entire culture of intolerance on all sides of the issue, which will make any possible resolution that much more difficult to achieve.
Maybe not as calculatingly evil as Hitler. His is just ignorant stupidity and hopeless intransigence.
2006-10-22 20:52:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by rkallaca 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
Look up dictator in the dictionary, if you have one. Other wise your question doesn't merit answering. Forgive you for you know not what you say! I don't think you live in the United States.
2006-10-22 20:54:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by DeeJay 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
As soon as Bush systematically kills 1 million people because they are not worthy than yes. Get a grip.
2006-10-22 20:50:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by borgostunna 1
·
2⤊
2⤋