Doubt it. What smells? Republicans dirty foul-smelling diaper.
2006-10-22 18:24:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I apologize for my uncivil remarks, but some users on this forum anger me with their uncivilty. I guess it's contagious.
2006-10-22 18:51:55 · update #1
abosolutely not, u know thats the main reason they went there. all this "spreading democracy" and "freeing the people" is a bunch of bs.
2006-10-22 18:27:44 · answer #1 · answered by animagus85 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hard to say. But don't criticize all Republicans. I'm a Republican, but I'm humble enough to admit that my leader has done some pretty stupid things. There were no weapons of mass destruction, so we should pull out. Iraq has already tried a democratic government three times. It obviously can't work because of its culture.
2006-10-23 01:27:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. Amazing, all this time I thought he was at the White House.
All this stuff seems very personal. From what I am reading, Bush must be on a one man crusade. Everything seems to be attributable to this one guy. Amazing.
2006-10-23 01:29:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush probably would not be invading Iraq if there was no oil, he'd be in Iran, and they hate us too.
2006-10-23 01:27:17 · answer #4 · answered by Sunny 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably not. How would you get along without oil?
What if terrorist nations seized the oil fields and had America by the nads?
Grow up.
2006-10-23 01:30:26 · answer #5 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No oil in Rwanda, or Sudan either.
2006-10-23 01:30:23 · answer #6 · answered by Farnham the Freeholder 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, because it wouldnt be business.
2006-10-23 01:28:46 · answer #7 · answered by Gabrio 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, of course not. next question
2006-10-23 01:35:01 · answer #8 · answered by Jessy 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We probably would never of gone there then......
2006-10-23 01:27:02 · answer #9 · answered by ☠Naz☠ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋