I know both have their positive sides but out of Drew Brees and Reggie Bush which was more of an accessory to the team? Would the Saints be as good if we would have only gotten one of them?
2006-10-22 16:03:09 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
i see that someone brought up the fact that bush only has one TD but that is because they use Bush to get down teh field and use Deuce Mccallister for the touchtowns. Thats only through observation not statistical evidence.
2006-10-22 18:13:23 · update #1
Drew Brees is why they are winning. He proved he could win when he quarterbacked San Diego. Bush is only good for the publicity he brings to the team. He has not done anything spectacular running the ball. He is too small to break tackles. People has to realize this isnt the Pac 10 where all you have to do is run past people. This the NFL where all players are bigger and faster. The Saints best move by far is getting a good QB.
2006-10-22 16:30:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Drew Brees has done more for them than Reggie Bush. If they had a crappy QB still, they probably wouldn't winning like they are now.
2006-10-22 23:12:12 · answer #2 · answered by football chick 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have to go with Bush, too big an upside, Brees already has a damaged/repaired throwing arm.
2006-10-22 23:28:27 · answer #3 · answered by wdr31 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
BRESS definently, all bush dose is get the fans attention, he only has 1 TD and that came on a punt return.........................if it wasent for brees the saint would be in last place as usuall in the brudal afc south
2006-10-22 23:09:00 · answer #4 · answered by J.G. Racing Domination 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
for the next couple of years Brees
but for long term Reggie Bush
Brees is why they are in playoff contention this year
2006-10-23 00:12:03 · answer #5 · answered by Adam P 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋