I'd bury them the same place I buried the ones that crashed at the Mexican border. Under tons of red tape trying to get a settlement from the airline.
2006-10-22 15:58:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by eferrell01 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ummm well I suppose you could bury them in Peru but that wouldn't be diplomatically correct and might cause a war so it might be better to bury them in Canada because it's colder up there and would preserve the bodies until they can be returned to their families. Hope this helps! Aw come on guys I'm joking! No need for a thumbs down!
2016-03-28 04:33:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ha! Ha! That's an old one. You wouldn't bury the survivors since they're still alive!
2006-10-22 15:56:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by SalemAlum 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
You would have to bury them deep. Survivors are likely to kick the dirt off themselves.
2006-10-22 15:57:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well if you want to bury the survivors you shouldnt tell anyone where since its a crime.
2006-10-22 15:58:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Answer guy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a very old one, survivors dont get buried, only the dead people do
2006-10-22 15:56:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by maggie_at0303 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You would bury the survivors wherever they wanted to be buried.
2006-10-22 17:51:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by futureastronaut1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the country they choose to be buried in when they eventually die.
2006-10-22 15:59:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Helmut 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither. The survivors wouldn't be buried because they aren't dead.
2006-10-22 16:00:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by songbird 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
would you be burying them alive?
2006-10-22 15:56:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by gymnastgirly622 2
·
0⤊
0⤋