English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

prisoners have more morals than the gop, just look at the facts

2006-10-22 15:21:24 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

the gop knew of foley for years and did nothing , guess fox news blamed the dems ,so very typical

2006-10-22 15:30:16 · update #1

the gop knew of foley for years and did nothing , guess fox news blamed the dems ,so very typical

2006-10-22 15:30:17 · update #2

so many stupid repuds , fox news hook line and sinker, keep you head buried ,I like IT when you lose touch with America lol

2006-10-22 16:28:51 · update #3

16 answers

The Republicans protect their pedophiles so the Christians don't witness the vile behavior. If the Christians find out, they won't vote in blocks of thousands in their big churches for Republicans Still, the Republican pedophiles can't suppress the urge to harrass kids. So their evil is exposed and then stories are made up so that Christians will symphathize.

2006-10-22 15:27:49 · answer #1 · answered by Reba K 6 · 1 5

You need to do some homework. Take a look at Democrat Studds and find out what the Democrats did when they heard he had “sex” (not talk dirty) to his page. The Democrats gave him a standing ovation and they reelected him 6 more times, although he buggered the boy on taxpayer money with an “official” trip overseas.

You have just been listening to political propaganda. When you grow up you’ll realized that there are people that deceive to get power, and you bought their hype hook line and sinker.

For instance the DailyKos suggested as a source is actually run by the same guy Dean hired to raise all that money for him on the Internet when he was running for president.

Next time be smart and use your own brain instead of being lead by others.

Sorry.

2006-10-22 15:27:04 · answer #2 · answered by Raylene G. 4 · 4 1

What pedophiles? Are you talking about Foley?
A pedophile is one who molests pre-pubescent children, not one who sends emails and instant messages to sixteen year olds. The only thing Foley did wrong (which was bad enough to demand his resignation had he not given it freely) was abused his power. Period.

Also, there is absolutely NO PROOF that the GOP had ANY knowledge of what Foley was doing. Lots of congresspeople send emails to pages. Some even develop friendships with them.

BTW:
1) I'm not a Republican. I am a moderate conservative with NO affiliation with either party. I tend to vote mostly Republican, but that's only because I like the candidates. I have voted for many Democrats as well, because I like them, and their platform.
2) I do not receive all my news from FOX. I take it, and many other news sources, with a grain of salt.
3) I can't stand Rush Limbaugh, and Hannity and Colmes yell too much for me. I do like Ann Coulter's books, though. I prefer to read it, rather than listen to it.

So just because you like to stereotype people doesn't make you right.

2006-10-22 15:24:46 · answer #3 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 4 1

Go to DailyKos or DemocraticUnderground. Please go there unless you have a question.

And, punctuation is your friend.

For the record, no one is "protecting pedophiles." The GOP threw his *** out. The Dems knew about those emails and messages for months, as well as the rumors that go back years, and they didn't do anything either.

In fact, the Dems now honor a guy who had sex w/ an intern the same age as the one in the current situation, re-electing him several times to the House.

At least Dubya uses punctuation.....

2006-10-22 15:26:24 · answer #4 · answered by geek49203 6 · 3 1

SPEAKING OF PROTECTING PEDOPHILES, HOW ABOUT REWARDING THEM?:::::::::::Pelosi voted three times to make a convicted page sexual predator,
former Congressman Gerry Studds (D-Mass.), chair of a congressional committee.
In 1990, Pelosi voted against censuring Barney Frank for having his live-in boyfriend
run a prostitution ring from Frank's apartment.
Pelosi raised no objections when Clinton pardoned Democrat Congressman Mel Reynolds (Ill.)
who had been convicted of felonies for having had sex with a 16-year-old campaign worker.
The historic Nancy Pelosi is an authentic representative of San Francisco liberal values and hardly
has the record to lecture anyone on cleaning up the Congress:::::::::::::

2006-10-22 15:50:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The GOP was aware of e-mails which were not sexual in nature. Foley was told to stop what he was doing. Only later did he engage in sexually related instant messages.

How is that "tolerating" sexual perverts?

Why not ask why a gay advocacy group in DC sat on this story for years and revealed it weeks before an election?

You're an idiot.

2006-10-22 16:18:31 · answer #6 · answered by C = JD 5 · 4 1

Politicians of all stripes seem to value their party's power over any sense of right or wrong. The dems had a representative (Studds) who did more than send emails to an underage page and not only did the dems not call for his resignation, they helped him get re-elected.

2006-10-22 15:46:55 · answer #7 · answered by Faeldaz M 4 · 2 1

Put down the fool aid, sir. Foley was forced to resign by the GOP.
It is the Democrats who support the efforts of their beloved ACLU to defend such lovely groups as NAMBLA with taxpayer dollars, and let Barney Frank and Ted Kennedy behave however they wish with no penalty. Why, they even condoned adultery in the highest office in our government. The party of perversion is the one whose symbolic symbol is, appropriately, an ***.

2006-10-22 15:27:10 · answer #8 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 5 1

Get a life. The actions of a couple of people don't represent a whole party. And look who's talking anyway, the dems not only tolerate perverts, they reelect them and give them leadership positions. Hypocrite.

2006-10-22 15:25:18 · answer #9 · answered by newbie 4 · 3 1

Scumbag, you asked this question under the "Elections" subsection.

Go to "Politics," because that's the one where everyone asks rhetorical, hateful, unenlightened, unsophisticated, moronic "questions" -- when they aren't really asking a question, just ranting. That's where this "question" belongs.

2006-10-22 15:36:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers