We are destroying their habitats...
2006-10-22 14:53:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's not a good reason for overpopulation. I'm sure when Pligrims came over they had run in with animals. New developments do reach into wildlife habitat, but that alone doesn't qualify as evidence overpopulation.
2006-10-26 01:08:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
habitat destruction. We are continually encroaching in their environment. Just wait until humans find a way to live to be 150 like many scientists believe will happen. Our planets fauna will only be seen in virtual reality. Zoos will become a theater where visitors sit in a recliner and put on virtual reality headsets and take a virtual tour of the zoo.
The only critters you will see is that guy in Key West walking around with a parrot on one shoulder and an iguana on the other, both of which are older than him.
2006-10-22 22:05:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by viewAskew 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The overpopulation problem is with mankind. We continue to build and the wildlife has nowhere else to go.
2006-10-22 21:08:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by honiebyrd 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, and I can give yo another.
So many unnecessary structures are being built, one after the other. And there are completely unused buildings taking up space and not being used.
I think a lot more space and land would be saved if old structures would be recycled.
2006-10-22 21:04:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tili L 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Out growing country life. More opportunies in the city.
2006-10-23 00:34:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by robert m 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The animals are NOT coming into the city...humans are building in the "wild", where the animals have been all along, but where the humans are encroaching.
2006-10-23 02:48:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of who the animals or humans?
2006-10-22 21:04:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by firemandan900 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
just for achange
2006-10-23 07:37:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by NR 1
·
0⤊
0⤋