Reduce govt Spending?

Question

What programs should be reduce or cut with the goverment spending? I know people are gonna pick there favorites here. Also, taxpayers cant demand more, and more when we in debt. Swedish can keep there books cleaner than others. Lets cut goverment growth rate in spending by a couple % points? Were gonna have to do it soon????Can't raise taxes to do it becaues the lafferty curve tells you raising means tax evasion? solve the riddle??

Answer 1

No riddle! The easiest way to cut government spending is to cut what it most redundant-the salaries of those sitting in Congress and the House of Rep. It isn't like they are doing anything to help those who elected them anyway, so do them like they want to do to school teachers-pay them based on merit. They want teachers to be paid a decent salary when their students low scoring on standardized tests meets government standards(govt. standards a joke in itself) so the people sitting in Congress and the House of Rep. should be paid based on the help that they get for the people in their states/districts. If they don't do anything to benefit the majority of the people of the state that they represent, then they get no pay. And I think making these people more accountable for what they are doing will help cut needless spending in other areas.

Sounds fair to me!

Answer 2

This is an easy riddle to solve. Our current politicians are not serious about making the Federal Govt financially fit. As time goes on, other currencies like the Euro will become more competitive with the dollar. This will result in a serious devaluation of the dollar, lost confidence in our governments ability to pay back debt, and eventually interest rates will go up as a result.

This is bad for the long term health of our government and our economy. We need to figure out a solution to this now.

Answer 3

Start by allowing corporate bidding on every service provided to the public by the government. Corporations know how to run a business the most efficiently.

Get out of the entitlement business. Make social security need-based now.

Provide as welfare only the following (and only for moms of children under 5):
child care
medicaid
WIC

Regarding "welfare:" Stop encouraging women to have children out of wedlock-- provide the above to all mothers of children under 5, regardless of marital status--base solely on household income.

Go to a Fair-tax or national sales tax scheme.

Tie corporate tax cuts to benefits they provide to their employees.

Answer 4

No, it extremely is not. Re-allocating spending is extremely significant, in spite of the undeniable fact that. i recently heard that the Marshall plan cost approximately 0.5 one thousand billion money (adjusted for inflation). as quickly as I learn what grew to become into performed with that 0.5 trillion against what grew to become into performed with the 0.5 trillion in Iraq I regard it as no longer something decrease than evidence that our modern-day government isn't spending our money properly. And on the subject of candidate; i'm no longer useful to assert, yet i could wager some rather stable money that no longer a unmarried one from the two party will honestly cut back spending. it extremely is merely no longer the way they artwork. they are going to make spectacular talk, yet it extremely is all it's going to be.

Answer 5

Well for starters we could do away with the IRS and all the money they are wasting trying to scare tax payers. Enact the fair tax to finance government and social security.

Although I like ruth-the meanie's answer. We could get rid of the Postal service right off the top. Sell it off to Fed-x or UPS or let them bid on it.

Answer 6

I think we can cut the welfare program and create new jobs and find a way to create daycare for women cheaply.

Answer 7

Everything possible. But leave only a little to protect are rights, property, and life from infringing others.

Answer 8

Reduce gov't spending?
Again?!?! But that trick never works!!!!