MOM DAD and kids having been born AFTER marriage.
You are FOR - GAYS (and gay marriage and adoption), illegitimate children (should not force marriage), and all sorts of bad behaviors.
2006-10-22 12:18:44 · 25 answers · asked by E LIB o NATOR 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You are correct.
Liberals want us as a society to ACCEPT all their deviant behavior - they know it's wrong but don't want to be "judged" for it.
My stoner "friends" back in High School didn't want to be judged for smoking pot either. They said is was okay and that I should try it. They got extremely MAD at me for never doing it and were mean. BUT, 10 years later at our reunion, they said how PROUD they were to be my friend and that I was great for being so strong and not doing bad things. You see - they grew up. Libs live in a perpetual state of immaturity.
2006-10-22 12:27:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
The issue is not who is "for" or "against" anything. The issue is whether or not the INDIVIDUAL approves of a happy family, no matter the composition. As an adoptee, I say that it's much better for the emotional well-being of a surrendered child to have ANY loving, sane family (gay or straight) than to grow up feeling "unwanted" in a group home. And legitimacy doesn't matter anymore (in educated society)! What is this, the 1920s??
2006-10-22 14:30:22 · answer #2 · answered by sketchy_people 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is the problem. Why is it that the Govt gives special privileges to people who are married. I hate that only because it tells me that a married man or woman is better then me, who is single. It tells me that you have special rights because you found someone and I haven't. Total BS. The Govt should have no point in being in someones love life period. If you want to get married fine, go to your church or Wal mart or something and have your wedding. But Republicans like you allow the Govt into your love life when it has no purpose being there in the first place.
Now you are against gays getting married, because those SPECIAL privileges would probably not be available to you when in fact they shouldn't have been in the first place.
2006-10-22 12:30:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
By traditional You must mean family arranged marriage. Where often times before the child is born it is pre arranged whom they will marry and when.
This is traditional with over a 5000 year history World Wide of arranged marriage how much more traditional could you wish for.
Go big Red Go
2006-10-22 12:28:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Liberals are NOT against a traditional family. Kindly check the voting history of our Conservative congress and senate. It is not wise to assume all Liberals are same in all areas or all Conservatives are same in all areas. OUR politicians ( Yours and Mine ) do not vote on good or bad behaviors they vote by what they think will get them re-elected or best for their future. You and I weather we are Liberal or Conservative are only one vote, they will take either or both they don't care what behaviors we live by. Ask how many Conservatives, Have assorted bad behaviors that you make excuses for???
2006-10-22 12:58:47 · answer #5 · answered by canvasman 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nice try with the bs assumption. In fact liberals aren't against any kind of marriage.
Why are conservatives only for the narrow (50s) definition of marriage?
2006-10-22 12:33:30 · answer #6 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Yah....hmmm...like the traditional family where over fifty percent of marriage ends in divorce?
The traditional family that exists solely in fairly tails, bad 50's sitcoms and the minds of conservatives?
2006-10-22 12:30:25 · answer #7 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Like your values - having a wife with a boyfriend or girlfriend
on the side?
You have nerve telling me what my values are, when your
representatives are presenting us with a scandal a day.
Where Are your values? There are 40 million people in this
country without health care & poverty is increasing daily.
The things you choose to worry about will just divide this
country more, rather than to find solutions to the Real problems.
2006-10-22 12:41:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
Cuts into all the votes they can get from seeming to accept a wide range of people.
Scary fact is the most bigoted, narrow minded people in our area are fine upstanding democrats - that only embrace the poor or minorities at Christmas time.
2006-10-22 12:31:56 · answer #9 · answered by Akkita 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
If I knew that I wouldn't get banned I would tell you exactly what democrats think. It is to bad that you are so closed minded that is all you think about other human beings. Shame on you, enjoy your little bubble of a life.
2006-10-22 12:36:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋