A fetus is not a baby? Oh, really? Then what is it? That's like saying a sapling is not a tree and a bud is not a flower.
I know, I know, the libs have convinced themselves and try to convince women that a fetus is just a "bunch of tissue". Excuse me, folks, before the mother even knows she is pregnant, that "bunch of tissue" has arms, legs, developing fingers and toes and looks VERY human.
Its a "facist" decision to outlaw the planned and intentional murder of innocents? Oh really? I find it so odd to see how libs rationalize all their ways of looking at things and then euphemize them with terms like "right of choice" or "undocumented immigrant".
One thing about the libs, they can find a new word for almost anything. By the way, what is this "neocon" business? It seems to be the new buzzword for them. Let's see, two prefixes put together that means "new" and "against"(con can also mean "with"). So, I guess conservatives are now "new against (with)" people? Sounds like liberal thinking to me---inane and totally without depth.
2006-10-22 11:53:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nancy W 2
·
5⤊
6⤋
Liberals believe that abortion is a woman's choice since it is her body in which the baby has been conceived and to be borne from. Plus, a baby is technically not considered living until it is born, this it is not murder. War is a violation of an Innocent's right to peace in their life however.
I personally ride a weird line between liberal and conservative, so I guess the right category for me is independent, I dunno. I believe that the only time a pregnancy should be aborted is if the pregnancy is ectopic (meaning the baby is growing some where other than the womb, endangering the mother's life) As far as war, I don't like the Iraq war. I will admit, some good developments have been made, but now is just over doing it because for the most part, the only reason problems arise is because Americans haven't left yet. I don't like most any war actually. I think that if a war should be waged, it should only be between a select group of persons and not countries.
This is just what I know, so it may be different for some one else.
2006-10-22 12:00:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Shel K 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
Brother and sisters in humanity. We cant blame all Christians and you cant paint all Christan's with the comparable Brush. to a pair human beings warfare is corporation warfare brings earnings the gross sales arm making corporation makes money warfare is the main important corporation than activities or pornography. human beings makes use of the religion or a followers of a faith and physique them to justify warfare and wins peoples heart. Media is yet another place and if warfare occurs or taking place it Brings earnings the media industries. this is no longer proper who you're yet while a united states is helpful he will oppress you except you help them is a diverse count number. We study this from historic previous of wars. no longer faith. As believer my self abortion is unlawful except if your existence in threat. Abortion does no longer deliver earnings so we are in a position to declare its against Christianity. yet warfare makes us stronger and extra rewarding so we depart faith as section. and shop somewhat or call it for justice or for protection. yet who cares approximately humanity and this proves from the midsection east conflict between Israel and Palestine. Democracy is only for tutor and its like 2 wolf struggling with for one lamb. yet while democracy develop into used in impartial way than we does no longer have those difficulty in the international.
2016-12-08 19:16:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by barsky 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's an awful generalization.
• Not all liberals support abortion.
• Not all liberals are against the war.
I could take what you said and turn it around:
Why do conservatives kill hundreds of thousands of innocents but don't want to let a woman end an unwanted pregnancy?
2006-10-22 12:13:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
because they support choice instead of promoting a society where people are compelled by lack of basic monetary needs necessary to go to college or have a healthy life to enter the military to carry out imperialist conquests for the richest 2% of elites in the USA.
Liberals do not "favor abortion" if you did your homework you'd know that they support a women's right to choose if she wants to have an abortion or not, rather than allowing the Sate to make that choice for her (a fascist decision).
learn
2006-10-22 11:38:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
4⤋
I favor an individual womans right to make a difficult decision over the backseat driving-conservative, and this war was started on false pretenses. Two different issues.
2006-10-22 11:37:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by brian2412 7
·
5⤊
4⤋
Maybe it is all those hair care products that Big Corporations are making from fetal tissue.
Had any collagen lately.
I'm a little more upset over grinding babies into lipstick than the dead issue.
At least the babies go to heaven (if you believe in heaven) if not then non issue.
Go big Red Go
2006-10-22 11:50:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Now here's the rub - why are conservatives FOR the killing of MANY MORE Iraqi civilians and US soldiers who certainly (and unequivovably) DO have rights, unlike foetusus - who it at least CAN be argued do not?
2006-10-22 11:44:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mordent 7
·
5⤊
4⤋
Because they do not veiw the unborn as human.
They see war victims as human, but where they go wrong
is not seeing beyond this picture. They do not see war as ever possibly being for the greater good.
They live for today, and sometimes ignore what could happen tomorrow.
2006-10-22 11:42:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Oh Tami !! 2
·
3⤊
6⤋
Because we had no right going over there and attacking them. Too many people have died in the 'war on terror'.
Also, it's a woman's right to choose. A fetus is not a baby.
2006-10-22 11:36:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by missqteeone 3
·
7⤊
5⤋