Ok it's hypothetical, so never mind the logistics of how they all came to be dangling off this cliff blah blah blah. Just go with your gut instinct. If you had to choose, who would it be & why?
(& no, there is no magical way that you can save everybody!)
2006-10-22 08:48:21 · 11 answers · asked by amp 6 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I save as many as i can save.
Meaning my answer to your question is whoever's nearest to me.
There is NO MORAL ANSWER in CHOOSING which GETS TO LIVE and which HAS TO DIE.
2006-10-22 09:23:30 · answer #1 · answered by Roka 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd started to say I'd save them all or die trying but since you've added a qualification to the query:
I'd save the children first.
Why? The children are our heritage. They are what we live for and the best part of our lives.
2006-10-22 08:54:04 · answer #2 · answered by ax2usn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My son because I've already lost 1 child and couldn't bear to lose another, even if it meant the rest of my family perished.
2006-10-22 09:20:11 · answer #3 · answered by llsBabygirl918 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would leap over the cliff with them so we could all be reincarnated together.
2006-10-22 08:49:40 · answer #4 · answered by Isis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would save the non-Christian.
2006-10-23 18:49:12 · answer #5 · answered by X M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The mother of my children. Its only logical.
2006-10-22 08:58:40 · answer #6 · answered by Capt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
then save them one by one
2006-10-22 10:02:47 · answer #7 · answered by lolipop 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My life-partner.
Sorry family-members.
2006-10-22 08:59:43 · answer #8 · answered by DarthBird 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would leap off first so i wouldnt have to see them suffer, but i embrace death
2006-10-22 09:50:19 · answer #9 · answered by kaka 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the love of my life.
2006-10-22 09:27:53 · answer #10 · answered by manny f 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋