Some did. Some did not. Depending on the mission.
The airplanes built for these missions were purposefully made with landing gear that would fall off upon takeoff and could be reused. Most of these planes carried just enough fuel for the mission, so that even those who wanted to come back . . . could not.
Most knew that it was a one-way mission, and that a returning kamikaze pilot would be the subject of ridicule which, in the Japanese mind, would be a fate worse than death.
However, towards the end of the war as Kamikaze missions became less and less effective, the Japanese, who had lost thousands of combat pilots and were feeling the affects on their war effort, chose another strategy for air-to-air combat. Just before the kamikaze pilot was about to engage an enemy plane in an air-to-air crash, he would eject. These pilots used parachutes in order to safely land in air or sea and be picked up by their troops. They could live to fight another day.
However, "To die for one's country was honorable and to live and fight another day was shameful" for the early Kamikaze pilots, and, therefore, most flew without parachutes.
2006-10-22 09:10:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hoops 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
stable solutions given so far. easily, the quantity of danger does not justify the situation, further weight, and soreness of wearing a parachute in maximum popular aviation circumstances. whether, as pronounced, some inner maximum pilots do certainly carry parachutes the two via very own selection or via regulation for particular styles of flight (aerobatics, by way of fact the occasion given above). additionally, ballistic restoration parachute systems (BRS) are attainable for many gentle popular aviation airplanes or maybe come extensive-unfold on some airplanes (Cirrus SR22). those systems are designed with a great parachute to shop the airplane itself and its pilot/occupants and are generally meant to circumvent crashes by way of unrecoverable stalls/spins. there is extremely some debate obtainable to whether having those systems on GA airplanes might have brought about injuries brought about via pilots who took on undue danger (flying into common icing circumstances, working example) that they does not have in any different case taken on in an airplane devoid of parachute device.
2016-10-15 07:47:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don`t know but it reminds me of a story I read a long time ago, about a kamikaze pilot who flew forty missions, absolutely hilarious, all the excuses for returning to base, I wonder if anybody remembers it?
2006-10-22 08:42:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Spanner 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well I have learned something to-day, thank you. I thought the answer to this question was `no`. Also I thought the pilots were "nailed in" their aircraft, so they couldn`t change their minds.
2006-10-24 23:10:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Social Science Lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some did and some didn't. Most of the one who didn't used meth instead. Such as crystal meth. True
2006-10-22 10:26:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by ffsotus 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. They had built in sensors so they would automatically open on impact.
2006-10-22 08:37:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why yes, Anthony. They did.
2006-10-22 08:35:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
ONLY FOR THEIR CO PILOT'S
2006-10-22 08:35:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Oddly enough, they did!
2006-10-22 08:34:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by infernal_seamonkey 4
·
1⤊
0⤋