2006-10-22 07:15:49 · 30 answers · asked by MATT B 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Wasps have been known to farm aphids as a food source. Yes wasps sting and yes wasp venom has been known to kill people that are allergic. But, as humans we have developed sentience and have learned to be afraid of things rather than warned off becuase of colours etc. However if this post was about Bengal tigers (equally as frightening) then people would say no. We have no right to eradicate a whole species simply because we consider them undesireable
2006-10-22 07:36:20 · answer #1 · answered by disgruntledcatfish73 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wasps are like Daleks - evil killimg machines without soul or concience...
Doctor: 'If someone who knew the future, pointed out a child to you and told you that that child would grow up totally evil, to be a ruthless dictator who would destroy millions of lives... could you then kill that child?' Sarah Jane Smith: 'We're talking about the Daleks. The most evil creatures ever invented. You must destroy them. You must complete your mission for the Time Lords!' Doctor: 'Do I have the right? Simply touch one wire against the other and that's it. The Daleks cease to exist. Hundreds of millions of people, thousands of generations can live without fear... in peace, and never even know the word "Dalek".' Sarah Jane Smith: 'Then why wait? If it was a disease or some sort of bacteria you were destroying, you wouldn't hesitate.' Doctor: 'But if I kill. Wipe out a whole intelligent life form, then I become like them. I'd be no better than the Daleks.'
Doctor: 'I know that although the Daleks will create havoc and destruction for millions of years. I know also, that out of their evil, must come something good.'
No I would not kill wasps off - perhaps wasp venom cures cancer! Also unless a wasp actually stings me then it has not done me any harm so I sould not harm it first.
2006-10-22 07:26:39 · answer #2 · answered by monkeymanelvis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No due to the fact that all animals have a distinct role in the world biome. For instance, wasps feed their young with many common pests such as aphids, flies and caterpillars.
Aphids eat plants, as do caterpillars. Flies spread germs among creatures.
If wasps were to be eradicated, the amount of pests would increase surmountably.
2006-10-22 07:20:02 · answer #3 · answered by San Jose 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually i wouldint, Because Wasps and bee`s both polonate Flowers and flowers grow into trees or plants and that gives us what we breath not going to spell it.
But they can be a pain in the butt with there Stinging and buzzing ¬.¬
2006-10-22 07:22:05 · answer #4 · answered by Brocken Spirit 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ten years ago I would have because when they sting, you really know about it! However, if I did completely eradicate them I'd probably be screwing nature up in some way - and I'd still have Bees to contend with anyway!
2006-10-22 07:18:31 · answer #5 · answered by John P 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Damn right I would! I got stung several times as a child. Once above my eye, once on my lip and once a wasp flew inside my shirt and got me on the shoulder. Very nasty. Anytime I see one I take it out with a newspaper. Pre-emptive strike every time. I get it before it gets me.
2006-10-22 07:56:18 · answer #6 · answered by K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wasps get rid of alot of dead wood, plus they are part of an important balance in the eco system, so although I'm not keen i would keep em
2006-10-22 07:26:16 · answer #7 · answered by : 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, because they are part of the food chain. They keep other worse insects under control. The purpose of their sting is to paralyse their prey so that they can then feast on it and so keep the number of other pests down. One of their favourite foods is the European earwig.
2006-10-22 07:28:15 · answer #8 · answered by whyme? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
see you later as means is synonymous with money there is no way for corruption to be eliminated from planet Earth. if the means to heal, the means to be worrying and sparkling on your ecosystem, the means to be type and beneficiant were held in as severe esteem because the means to stay in luxury and to subjugate the ecosystem and different human beings for your will there might want to be no corruption because the incentive of corruption is to fulfill a opt to locate esteem in means and peer envy. human beings, it type of feels, are extra in awe of those who can threaten and take advantage of them than of those who love and may want to care about them. the wealthy bypass the wealth and means among themselves at the same time as those who generate the wealth for them sink deeper into powerlessness and poverty. this is the desire of the terminally poor and powerless to sometime be accurate dogs that makes heroes of grasping smugly adverse CEOs and conflict profiteering politicians.
2016-12-05 02:48:00 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unless someone could prove to me that they had a purpose i would in a snap! my husband is horribly allergic to them and swells up like a balloon if one gets him and i'm not looking forward to the first time my daughter gets stung in case she has the same reaction!
2006-10-22 07:18:57 · answer #10 · answered by Andromeda Newton™ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋