2006-10-22 07:12:05 · 8 answers · asked by tyh_yu 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
No. Places are defined by somethings. If you want to move a something, you will have to move it to a place where there is currently a nothing, so in that way, you would need a place defined by a nothing, but it is the movement of a something that creates that need and defines the actual size, shape and location of the place.
No nothings allow movements of somethings and in a way you could say that only spaces where nothing exists can truly be called spaces, but those spaces are themselves only defined by the adjacent somethings. If the place you seek is a place to put nothing, no place is as good as any other place.
2006-10-22 07:21:40 · answer #1 · answered by anyone 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, if we let nothing have its own place, then it might come over asking us to visit...and I really don't have the time to run out and buy some house warming gift for something that has nothing. It might get angry and say something like, "Oh just because I don't have anything you think you can give me this?!?!". I really don't have time for all of that.
2006-10-22 07:44:31 · answer #2 · answered by Fabledphilosophy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can anyone ever really do nothing, to do nothing would be to have never been,
2006-10-22 07:23:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes that way when we expand our cities the animals and plants have a place to go
2006-10-22 07:41:34 · answer #4 · answered by Nightchild 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course nothing need place! the same as something need trace.....
2006-10-22 07:16:12 · answer #5 · answered by T M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nothing is nothing.
2006-10-22 07:21:40 · answer #6 · answered by Julian 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What?!
2006-10-22 07:31:59 · answer #7 · answered by amp 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't really get it...............
2006-10-22 07:14:45 · answer #8 · answered by weresheepie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋