Yet they refer to 40 years ago about Bush and Vietnam?
Are they so easily brainwashed that they believe Dan Blather and those forged documents?
2006-10-22 06:30:13 · 13 answers · asked by John 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
what is the fascination of the libs with cute little rhyming sound bites?
2006-10-22 06:35:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The question is relevance. Bush has been president for 6 years, almost, and he would have all of us believe that everything bad is still Clinton's fault, like he has been going on vacation nonstop for 6 years or something. The 2004 election was Bush trying to puff up his chest as a great war leader- the issue of his missing time from the national guard was entirely relevant.
Bush and more importantly Rove know their base. Their core hate Clinton and his evil taxes so much that the mere mention of him causes them to break out into fits. The rest of us see this desperation and chuckle, especially when Clinton finally said, "enough of this crap."
2006-10-22 06:41:50 · answer #2 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The group calling itself , Swift Boat Veterans for truth relentlessly challenged John Kerry's military records during the 04 campaign to tarnish his image and credibility .
Then later , Bush found himself in a similar, yet worse, situation . Texans for Truth , voiced serious doubts about Bush's National Guard service . They talked to former Lieutenant Colonel Robert Mintz , who claimed that Bush was never in his unit in 1972 and nobody in his unit saw Bush there .
Texans for Truth later offered a reward of $ 50,000 for original information proving Bush served in the Air National Guard between May 1972 and 1973 at Dannelly Air National Guard Base in AL. The offer expired on Sept, 30 , 2004 , with out a taker .
Does that mean no one could prove that Bush was there ,when he said was ???
Seems that you are the one brainwashed for believing Bush !!!
The reason Vietnam is mentioned , is the Iraq war .
2006-10-22 08:25:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually, Bush's intellect and character can be torn down piece by piece without venturing into the past beyond 1999. However, since YOU brought up Bush and Vietnam, why did James Bath's name become blacked out of the record between 2000 and 2004? Could it be that Bush didn't want folks to know that Bath helped him finance his failed companies and campaigns with the Bin Laden money Bath was handling?
See links below for pdf's of direct documentation.
Jeff F: The links are to pdf's of the documents, not Moore's interpretation of them. Take a look and form your own opinion. When you reply with degradation of a person (ie referring to Moore as fat man from Flint), rather than degradation of their arguement, you remove all credibility to your case and actually lend credibility to theirs.
2006-10-22 06:43:47 · answer #4 · answered by Lisa M 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What the hell? Apples and oranges.
You bring Clinton up to try to blame every existing problem on him.
Bush's lack of service and avoidance of real service in Vietnam has to do with him and his Chickenhawk friends (Cheney, Wolfowitz, Libby, Rove - none of them served).
That said...it's never been that big o' deal to me. A lot of people avoided service. But, people still bring up Clinton not serving.
I guess my point is - each side plays "the past card" and it's futile, because you'll find just as many examples for the other side.
2006-10-22 06:42:07 · answer #5 · answered by WBrian_28 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wow! Wow your question just really proves how deluded this line of thinking is.
Bush is the current President therefor he is fair game.
Clinton may be a draft dodger but he admits it, unlike Bush who had family connections to keep him out of danger.Not that I blame him Id of done the same thing.
2006-10-22 07:01:55 · answer #6 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
U can lead a lib to shool but you can't make him think....Slick willie was a poor boy visiting communist russia during vietnam... so who funded the poor starving arkansas boy's trip? and paid for him to dodge the draft... well he didn't have the balls to fight anyhow. just like he had none against Bin Laden.. but it's ok slick willie looks quite sick these days like other sick dying disgusting libs. The sick libs will be shocked someday when they find out who his real daddy is.....
2006-10-22 06:37:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Lisa M are you ******* kidding me? Using the fat man from flint's web site as a credible source. I think I'll start using MAD Magazine as a source, at least it would be more credible.
2006-10-22 07:03:05 · answer #8 · answered by Jeff F 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do jerks keep bringing up Clinton? He's not running for office. Remember, Clinton may have lied, but nobody died!!
2006-10-22 06:33:35 · answer #9 · answered by CxeLady 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
yep check out the answer to my questions It is funny Simple questions with a link and they have no answer justing bashing and lying
2006-10-22 06:36:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋