2006-10-22 04:44:57 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If that choice takes away someones right
2006-10-22 04:49:25 · answer #1 · answered by slodana2003 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe in the statement "the right to swing your fist ends where the other mans nose begins". By that I mean that the government should only step in when someone else is going to be harmed in some way.
Just for honesty's sake I am pro choice.
2006-10-22 04:48:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, the government should not meddle in people's individual rights. They are doing too much of that, and it is wrong.
2006-10-22 04:53:02 · answer #3 · answered by JistheRealDeal 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only when he is impaired by chemicals designed to free the mind from the daily concerns of life . have as many wife's as you want pray to the devil eat poopy and that is all up to you .smoke dope drink have unprotected sex what ever you want .Sun bathe nude in your front yard for all i care and have sex in the open and not behind closed doors .
Each person is free to express him or her self in any manner they wish as long as it does not cause imminent physical harm to others .
2006-10-22 04:53:12 · answer #4 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Free choice of what ?
Individuals are not free to do anything they wish...
My free choice to smack you in the nose ?
2006-10-22 04:48:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The only things the government should enforce are laws.
2006-10-22 04:51:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought the GOP wanted less governmental intrusion
2006-10-22 04:47:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋