Gandhi lived in hut, spun his own cotton to make his own clothes which consisted of a white sheet and he came close to committing suicide that stopped a civil war in his own country which saved millions of lives. Who cares if he protected his savings for his family? He freed India and that is 100,000x more important.
2006-10-22 04:39:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The monarch would not have any surely power. we've a constitutional monarchy, meaning the monarch is subject to the regulations of the rustic like all people else. Parliament has its origins one thousand years in the past interior this variety of royal council. The Magna Carta in 1215 grew to become into standard to dodge the king from having finished power - the king can't levy or assemble taxes without consent of the council. by way of the years, Parliament progressively constrained the ability of the monarch finally culminating interior the English Civil conflict and execution of Charles I, formation of the Protectorate (crowned Republic) then the restoration of the monarchy with Charles II as a constitutional monarch with constrained authority. The royal kinfolk get earnings from the land they own and additionally some money from the government (by way of taxes) for costs and maintenance of the royal estates. The royal kinfolk are honestly internet individuals to the exchequor via fact of what they pay in taxes. those days, the monarch is head of state and the frontline royals additionally act as ambassadors. i think of the subject with the U. S. is that a President has to act as head of state, chief of the government and a flesh presser. they're bigger to an very almost religious determine, they have some distance too lots power, imo. the version with having a monarchy is you have a head of state that's no longer political, that's persevering with. The best Minister has much less power than a President and does no longer have the rigidity of being some god-like determine.
2016-11-24 22:33:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because he was not selfless. Don't believe what people say.. U better research on him.. In India all literature against him(which is true) is not allowed to publish as it is a crime. but search on internet. There are many other shocking truths abouth him.
Killing of Bhagat Singh, Partition of India-Pakistan, Sardar VAllabhai Patel... and lot more.
2006-10-22 04:45:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by inderpreet k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nehru acquired properties of INDIAN NATIONAL ARMY into his personal account, why gandhi could be a laggard?It was his service charge for the servantly services rendered to british and stabbing from behind to his countrymen.
2006-10-24 02:36:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not aware of your intentions R u sure Our Mahatma has huge property to enjoy lavishly?
Then why he fasted all his life instead of enjoying pot belly as our current netas proudly display
Tarnishing the image of Father of Nation that too
after his demise seems a fashion/trend. Some how
Those who follow him prosper and who abuse in public also thrive Like Great/Infamous Mayavathi who called Father of Nation with names in her own words a simple good for nothing primary school teacher living in Delhi slum now dazzle with diamonds and golden jewels etc Long live Father of nation
2006-10-22 05:50:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Balu 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
He was the most callous,narrow minded and ugly politician.He had broken the spine of indians.Everything he did had a very bad outcome.He had no quality to be a standard politician so he took the disguise of half-naked fakir to survive in politics.
2006-10-24 17:21:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is a totally non sensical, unfounded allegation, which is very much like that of Godse. Godse, at least never made any personal allegation against Gandhi. He in fact respected him for his morality.
2006-10-26 01:53:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What wealth he has acquired, you know of. In his name there no piece of land.
2006-10-23 04:34:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ask no questions on Gandhi. he is the mascot of congress party
2006-10-22 20:52:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brahmanda 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
family wealth is for family. for him it meant nothing as he had simplest clothing, simplest food and simplest shelters. for us Gandhi matters who helped us get freedom. that is all.
2006-10-22 05:06:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by premmakker 1
·
0⤊
0⤋