If so why?
2006-10-22 04:23:23 · 16 answers · asked by Ben Jammin 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No not tomorrow but we absolutely must make it clear that the Iraquis have to take over soon. Otherwise, if they're smart, they will keep not being ready and let it be our people dying over there.
2006-10-22 04:26:14 · answer #1 · answered by ash 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most democrats are not advocating an immediate pullout-- they want a gradual drawdown of troops and performance deadlines from the Iraq government. This is apparently the President's current position too. Lately, he's been using the term "cut and run" to describe the Democrat's plan in order to make it LOOK LIKE he has a different plan.
2006-10-22 04:28:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that. But I will say that the last thing we should do is let the Iraqis die place in place of Americans too early.. the US is there to bring them freedom. If the motives for the war were shady, atleast the troops are doing a noble deed. Leaving Iraq now would just be dastardly.
Essentially, it would be like.. alright, clean up the mess we've made.
The US has duty to stay there until Iraq says it's prepared to handle itself.
2006-10-22 04:31:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have a moral obligation to help stabilize Iraq. We broke it so now we have to help fix it. However I don't know what the best solution is. If the best move, in the interests of Iraq's, is for us to pull out immediately then we should do it.
We have to think more about what's good for Iraq and less about whats good for the US.
2006-10-22 04:33:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq might stay to tell the tale now. ideally i might eliminate the troops slowly, to enable the Iraqis take over the regulation enforcement little via little, so which you have no longer have been given a unexpected means grab via some loopy factions. interior the tip Iraq can actual be extra ideal off than earlier the conflict. And in simple terms think of all it cost exchange into trillions in debt, an financial recession and thousands of american lives! yet a minimum of each and every Iraqi might have well being care. individuals? they might fairly die than have well being look after some strange reason.
2016-10-15 07:30:51 · answer #5 · answered by josepa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you cant just suddenly pull all the troops out. that would make things even worse. iraq need to cement a strong government with our help, then troops can gradually leave.
2006-10-22 04:25:46 · answer #6 · answered by jimi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I.m for pulling out our troops now. We should have never entered into their business in the first place. Now, it appears that we are totally unappreciated, have invested millions of dollars for their cause and our men and women have shed their blood and lives for a cause that will never be accepted. I say, let Iraq fight and figure it our for themselves.
2006-10-22 04:30:57 · answer #7 · answered by Ichiban 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do. I never wanted them to go there is the first place and I do recall words about an "exit stategy" before they even went in. Those were the words of hubris. It was reported and obviously believed.
2006-10-22 04:28:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only the majority of the country, We should have never gone their in the first place, it was all a mistake.
2006-10-22 04:29:47 · answer #9 · answered by Pappy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it's like fighting a hornets nest with a two by four.
2006-10-22 04:29:41 · answer #10 · answered by notme 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋