does George Soros want the US Constitution to be rewritten?

Answer 1

He is trying to make it easier for terrorist cells to be set up in the U.S.

Answer 2

George Soros is a A$$ with too much money.

Answer 3

George Soros wants something....he thinks his money can buy.

Answer 4

I don’t believe that an answer is as straight foreword as th4e question implies. I think that you must look at those things which affected his way of thinking, such as the philosopher Karl Popper.

Then too his book, “The Age of Fallibility” provides some insight into his thinking, for example the following excerpt concerning thinking and reality:

************
Thinking and Reality
Our relationship to reality is more complicated than we realize. This holds true for humankind in general. American society in particular has developed some specific deficiencies in its attitude to reality. I propose to discuss the universal problem in the first part of the book and the specific problems of contemporary American society in the second part.
Thinking as Part of Reality
The fact that our thinking forms part of what we think about, has far reaching implications both for our thinking and for our reality.
When we ourselves participate in the events we think about, the complications become much more pervasive. Not only is our knowledge incomplete, but, more important, our imperfect understanding or fallibility becomes part of reality.
We cannot rely on knowledge alone when making our decisions. Reality is not independently given but is contingent upon our decisions. As a result, our decisions cannot correspond to what we would do if we possessed all the relevant facts. In other words, our behavior is not entirely rational.
But this way of putting it is already a distortion of what human reason can accomplish. It assumes that decisions could, in principle, be based on a consideration of all the relevant facts. That is a distortion that is deeply engrained in the way we look at our relationship to reality. Indeed, the mere fact that we speak of a relationship between thinking and reality implies that our thinking is somehow separate from what we think about. That is not so. The relationship between thinking and reality is not between two separate entities but between a part and a whole.
It is not reasonable to believe that we can acquire objective, dispassionate knowledge of something to which we belong, or that we can base our decisions on that knowledge. Yet this belief is widely held.
We have come to think of reality as something that is independent of our thinking in the sense that reality is out there waiting to be understood, and understanding reality consists of creating a picture in our mind that corresponds to it.
Indeed, when thinking and reality are separate it is possible to formulate statements that correspond to the facts. For instance, consider this statement: “It is raining.” It is a true statement. That works for some aspects of reality but not for others. When our thinking forms part of the reality we think about, the separation between thinking and reality is breached. Instead of a one-way correspondence between statements and facts there is a two-way connection.
Now consider this statement, “You are my enemy.” What I say may affect how you feel. The statement may correspond to a fact, but the correspondence does not signify knowledge because of the two-way connection. I may have turned you into an enemy instead of just passively recognizing that you are my enemy. The truth cannot be known because it is contingent on what we think. This puts the relationship between thinking and reality into a light very different from the one to which we have become accustomed.
Our view of the world will never correspond to the world as it is because we are part of the world, and what we think automatically becomes part of our world too. The way we look at the world changes the world.
**************

While some may read this and find it illuminating, it is not new concepts and has been addressed before and far better by others such as “J. Krishnamurti”.

At the very least Soros believes that large amounts of money can purchase political power. While this concept is not unique to Soros, it is antithetical to the Founders True Intent for the Constitution. So in that context Soros (at the very least) has little respect for the Constitution of the United States and in that sense represents a desire to change it (or disregard it) to fit his personal view of the world.

Answer 5

He wants the constitution to be thrown out. He wants to turn the US into a communist country like the one he grew up in.

Answer 6

Rejected Katherine Harris Campaign Video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvbPmiW7w9c&NR

Look at what Republican controlled Congress has done
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZhxAjXT9ns&mode=related&search=

Capital Hill Pages [The Cathoblicans] Mark Foley Is A Saint
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUy2ldV4HG4&mode=related&search=

Crazy Republican response to Foley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSxanxcCjgU&NR

Republican GOP pedophilia cover-up #1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3piSfxATRa4&mode=related&search=

Jon Stewart on Foley child predator sex scandal, 10/4/06
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNu085NUKGA&NR

Rep. Mark Foley's IM messages
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKCIb06d5Q0&NR

ABC News on Mark Foley
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GG1SDKRU3Vc&NR

Answer 7

wake up, both sides are run by elites who think they know best but all follow the same globalist vision

Answer 8

he wants to own it, turn us into Europeans and become dictator

Answer 9

No.