If the USA can't control in Iraq...could we beat China or Russia in a war.?

Answer 1

Well, I'd be afraid of china, there population is so high, they would just run right at you and as your shooting them they just come closer and closer, Russia will be more dangerous once Russia completes Iran's Nuclear power plant.......

Answer 2

Iraq is not a war. The war is over. Now, in the style of Vietnam and Korea we are assisting the local government and although everyone is loathe to say it, we are in a police action.

But we would be more than capable of taking Russia in a war. And we could never beat China. They have over 700,000,000 troops at the ready and an unknown amount of military vehicles. We would own the sea and air but the ground war is lost.

There will not be a war against those countries any way. To think there woudl be demonstrates an inability to comprehend global political economics.

Answer 3

lets weigh down Iraq below our boot heel, yet that does no longer help us benefit our objectives. The old regime, our authentic enemy in the conflict, replaced right into a paper tiger and collapsed right away. we want the hot Iraq to be autonomous and pleasant to us, so the politicians have determined we opt to "finesse" the problem with the insurgents. you comprehend those polls the position human beings say they are disillusioned with the conflict? properly, some persons are disillusioned because we sense the military might want to were allowed a more impregnable hand, accurate from the start. Take the incident in Faluja the position the bodies of those solders were abused and hung from a bridge. in my opinion we'd want to continually have dropped a MOAB on that bridge, and one yet another website the position atrocities like that were discovered. If we had carried out that early the Iraqi human beings might want to have feared us extra, yet that they had be turning in the terrorists, particularly than possibility the destruction of their community. A conflict with China might want to be an completely diverse count number. There might want to be no attempt at finesse. seem on the historic previous of WW II. there have been no new vehicles for years, because each and every of the factories were switched over to conflict production. gas replaced into rationed, so replaced into meat. human beings as we talk do not comprehend what total conflict is like.

Answer 4

We couldn't win a war agianst either country. The resources needed to do so would be astonishing. This is not the same country that went thru WWII, today people are far to shelfish and the sacrafice needed to do so would never be accomplished. In response to those saying just drop nukes, we might get away with a first strike but that would be it. Do not forget that both China and Russia have nuclear, biological, and chemical ICBMs just like the US. Don't forget they have stealth bombers just like the US also.

Answer 5

It's NOT about a "war on terror", "fighting for freedoms", or "beating China or Russia". The USA's obsession with Iraq is for the purpose of winning THIS secret "prize"!...

Answer 6

Who told you that we will fight China or Russia? Do you think that any country would pick up a fight with another country capable of posing a nuclear threat to it. Again, change this picture dude. You seem high !

Answer 7

Who would you pull for? If we had a war with either of those countries, the world, as we know it, would be gone. Too many nukes!!!!!!

Answer 8

Why would we need to defeat them . It would all be over in a blinding flash of light and a mushroom cloud anyway !!!

Answer 9

That is the typical, airheaded macho attitude towards cultures. That is why we've had useless wars.

Answer 10

why would we want to?upset at pevious answers and trying to pet the kitty in the wrong direction?