This might be a dumb question, but my head is loopy, so, oh well.
I know we have records of the past in the form of tangible items, like fossils, antiques, etc., and that we can document our own past with modern video technology.
So, knowing that still my question is this: Since all such records are incomplete, serving to more or less validate stories said of the past, but never with 100% accuracy, what makes some time travel theorists think the past still exists and can be entered? I'm not asking if we change the past once we enter it, but if the past dies in all ways other than those things which transcend small moments in time.
2006-10-22
01:50:22
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Other - Science
Well, the issue I'm trying to deal with is that many parts of the past are gone, such as buildings and people. So I wonder if there actually exists any kind of "stream," if you will, that could actually take us to them, and if that would require that the things that no longer are today be reformed along the journey down this stream, or if they are gone forever, or what? Is the past, in its whole, gone?
2006-10-22
02:02:37 ·
update #1