Bush and the FOX networks are fabricating the new one as we speak.
2006-10-22 01:49:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jenny_is_Hot 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Al Zawahiri, yes. Bin Laden, no. I think he's dead. You may remember the footage of a funeral in Pakistan that was taken by a drone flying overhead showing a huge number of Taliban fighters attending. Why would such a large number attend if not for their leader?
2006-10-22 01:45:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no longer lots. The economic device stands out as the defining situation of the 2012 election cycle except unemployment miraculously drops to approximately 5% interior the subsequent 6-9 months. those killings surpassed off too far in simple terms before the elections to be correct and can be in very undesirable style to apply them in political campaigns. whilst did Bush call "himself a "conflict President"? Democrats called him that. He did no longer.
2016-10-15 07:23:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, yes, I do... Seems to me that they would like to influence everything, so why wouldnt they? Oh, wait, I know...if things are going exactly the way they want, why stir the pot? I would guess that if Polls show Republicans gaining on Democrats, they may release a tape they've already prepared. If not before, we'll hear from them after.
2006-10-22 01:45:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by paradigm_thinker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
good question. I really thought the Bush Wacko would drag out Bin Ladens body by now. I do think Bin Laden is dead. If he is not dead then the Bush Wacko should not of ended the CIA task force to kill him. Since Bush did end that task force he may already know he's dead. It is also possible that the Bush Wacko lied about ending the task force.
2006-10-22 01:48:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you would have to be pretty stupid to believe that the escalations in iraq aren't to target change in america! this is how terrorists have done it for thousands of years! but you'll still get the people on here who think this isn't whats going on! this is a direct attempt to use the lefts weakness in wars to change our politics and to give them the reign that they are use to! they know the democratic party is the party of weakness!
2006-10-22 01:47:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless he is more stupid than we give him credit for, that would be the worst thing to do to change our government. I suspect a terrorost act of major proportion before the election.
2006-10-22 01:55:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by meathead 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course there will be. Because according to the GOP, they want the dems to win.
2006-10-22 02:23:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by . 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Movie editor and Photoshop locked on and ready man. =)
2006-10-22 01:44:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pero 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, and as you point out the irony is they need each other.
2006-10-22 01:45:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by hog b 6
·
0⤊
0⤋