probably. i don't see anybody else.
and he's not a man u reject - he's still young, we already have a first choice keeper - what good would it do him sitting on the bench all season? he's been playing very well for watford
2006-10-22 01:50:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I reckon that all you those who imagine that James is no1, are a similar those who imagine Heskey is remarkable and must be starting up the front. notwithstanding James can make some remarkable saves to maintain a recreation, he will also do some thing which will lose the game. Do none of you undergo in concepts James taking down Henry and dropping us the game in Euro 2004? Do none of you undergo in concepts the Austria recreation? there are a range of different examples, that tutor that James is too inconsistent and definitely too casual. there are cases even as he would not even look as though he's making an attempt or afflicted and also, he's too old. eco-friendly must be no a million, distinctly after his outstanding saves hostile to Mexico and Hart must be no 2. absolutely everyone yet CALAMITY!!!!!
2016-10-16 05:55:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He has got a huge potential, he needs to get in man u first team prove he as the quality on the international stage.
2006-10-22 01:29:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by richard_beckham2001 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
If he is it's only because there's a lack of quality english keepers. He's a man u reject playing for a championship team that got promoted.
2006-10-22 01:43:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jack c 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
If he proves himself, WHY NOT ?
To get the top job on merit in any business, you should really be the BEST!
2006-10-22 01:42:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Whistler R 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
he`s got a chance...
2006-10-22 01:43:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fudgie 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
probably
2006-10-22 05:50:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋