2006-10-22 00:10:14 · 5 answers · asked by David . 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
he said about 911 truth "Even if it were true, and its highly improbable who cares, it doesnt have any signifigance...like who killed jfk, who knows, and who cares, plenty of people get killed all the time."
2006-10-22 00:15:03 · update #1
Dd, what the hell does that mean?
2006-10-22 00:18:17 · update #2
Chomsky is a thinking man. If that makes him a gatekeeper for the left, so be it. He was using an argument called "reductio ad absurdum" when refering to 911 which of course he acknowledges and accepts as a tragedy.
What he was saying is let us look at the number of people killed by the US war in Iraq and compare it to the number who died in the WTC. Is an American life intrinsically more valuable than an Iraqi life? What about the thousands who die each year from handgun violence?
I am very proud that I am left handed.
2006-10-22 00:20:58 · answer #1 · answered by Joe M 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He is the biggest gatekeeper of them all. He still can't answer any quesions on 9/11, he just says that he does not believe it. He does not even look at the science
2006-10-22 05:04:28 · answer #2 · answered by Luke F 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like bolting the stable doors after the horse has gone - Noam is right - who cares, it's too late already, more fool you
2006-10-22 00:20:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Any devisions in the left only aid the far right.
2006-10-22 00:17:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No - he's a pseudo intellectual who recycles ideas.
2006-10-22 01:20:03 · answer #5 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋