Could it be possible that evolution theory be false?

Question

You say it could be inaccurate but you are saying evolution is true but just different to theory now. But could evolution is be false?

Just maybe actual reality of life and it's development is far from what the theory of evolution. I mean we were not there we can only assume something looking at past artifacts and data and put up a model we think fits. Maybe it was not that way.

Maybe given enough time and study of genetics that science may come to another solution and evolution is disbanded.

Answer 1

Yes it could be false, very much so. There are a lot of gaps to be filled, but it does seem at the moment that evolution is an important area of study - either to get it right to be sure it works, or to realise that it is wrong.

There is a lot of evidence that evolution is a valid arguement, and you are right that it is still a theory. After all, there was a lot of evidence that the Earth was the centre of the universe with all else revolving around it.

The thing about science is that everything tends to lie in the "beta" stage. It's all theories. It is very dangerous to accept things as fact in science, which is why we are always challenging current beliefs and developing our ideas. So you are right to ask such questions.

Answer 2

Everything we know could be false. Even gravity. I cannot tell you that I can prove that if you jump off a building you will fall and die, I can only offer you a preponderance of evidence to that effect.

Evolution has many components. The most basic has to do with the change of allele frequencies in a population. Alleles are what we call the parts of DNA that create specific traits. Simple things like brown eyes, to more complicated things like social behaviors. We "know" that these frequencies change over time. There is a preponderance of evidence that shows that. These changes are usually advantagous. The next step is to explain why this change occurs. The accepted theory is a "survival of the fittest" that advantages allow an organism to breed more, and therefore pass along their genes, their alleles, and thereby change the frequency. It is possible that will be shown false, but it is the most sensible conclusion of the evidence as we know it. Even the Catholic Church aknowledges this.

Now, the question is how far back you can take this. We look at the fossil record to show us how we might have changed into what we see today. The chances that a creature living 100,000 years ago might have died in a way that would allow the skeleton to be preserved until to day is extremely remote. Therefore, the fact that there are gaps in the fossil record is expected. Our interpretations of our species journey through evolution might change with more evidence, but it's unlikely that the entire idea will be shown false.

When you go all the way back to the origins of life, all we have are guesses. It has been shown that some of the earliest compontents of life could have spontaeously occured from the elements available at the time. It has been shown that it could happen, but that doesn't equal proof that it did happen. There is likely more to this story than we know now.

Answer 3

It is not strictly correct to say that any scientific theory is open to being disproved at any time, as some would like to imply.

As experimental evidence builds in support of a theory (and there is masses of it for evolution) then the less likely it becomes that a contradictory result would cause a theory to be abandonned rather than adapted. In other words, as evidence builds you can say that a theory is "mostly true" and contradictory evidence will cause it only to be "adapted" or "extended".

For instance, Newtonian mechanics is strictly wrong - experiments show quantum phenomena which led to a completely new branch of physics, phenomena which Newtons theories say nothing about. But Newtonian mechanics is still true enough for it to be the basis of all of the mechanics - buildings, cars, bridges etc - that surround you, as well as space travel. Hardly a disproved theory.

On this basis there is absolutely no prospect whatever that evolution is wrong. Evolution can even be observed at a molecular level in a laboratory today. It is a sound, exceptinally well experimentally and observationally supported piece of science. It is incomplete and there are questions to answer, but wrong - no.

Answer 4

Yes, it is possible. All scientific theories can eventually be proven to be "not true."

However, the suitability in any scientific theory is it's ability to predict unobserved events and changes in time. The Theory of Evolution, backed by the details known about DNA and heredity fill in what is needed to understand such events as the changing of bacteria to become resistant to antibiotics and the fact that the human flu virus is modified from year to year so that humans cannot get an automatic immunity to it.

Creationism cannot give a logical reason for humans to have tail bones or appendixes. We have no apparent need for either. The Theory of Evolution at least covers these and other matters that are not directly spoken about in the Bible.

Answer 5

properly, no longer precisely. the possibility of an entire, working cellular happening in a chemical soup is definitely extremely distant. yet there is one ingredient lacking in this: evolution itself. on each and every occasion a greater chemical is formed, then it continues to be positioned. the 1st life form exchange into no longer an entire cellular, yet in basic terms a team of proteins that in simple terms had the flair for permitting extra of a similar chemical compounds to form and be accrued. it incredibly is wrong to think of that the 1st living organism exchange into as complicated by way of fact those cutting-edge at present, even the least perplexing of the trouble-free cutting-edge micro organism. as quickly as that extra effective basic primitive micro organism gave thank you to an "more suitable kind", the quicker ones have been in simple terms worn out. the thought of evolution may well be fake, yet so far, there is not any longer something that policies it out, and the argument further via that e book isn't acceptable as such to accomplish that. it incredibly is a threat that it incredibly is fake, yet top now, nearly all of knowledge is that it incredibly is real; and the load to coach in any different case relax with those desirous to disprove it. and that i don't sense they have a prayer.

Answer 6

Possible,maybe.Probable,no. There is way too much archaeological evidence to support both evolution and natural selection.The exact progress may be innaccurate but that's how it happened.Charles Darwin devoted his life as have many other anthropologists and archaeologists to support this idea.
Too many of the events of the Bible have already bean disproved by science.Even the famous Shroud of Tourin was proven a hoax.It radio carbon dated over 1000 years after the death of Christ.It's thought to be a forgery created by Davinci

Answer 7

Evolution is not a Theory its a fact of life and it continues on today- I don't believe we were once Monkey's, but we were very crude and hairy people who lived in the wild and by learning we "Evolved" into modern man.

The Biblical explanation is not based on fact, but rather the absence of Knowledge of Evolution at that time, or certainly they would have used those facts had they known them.

Answer 8

All I see convinces me that evolution is false. Animals are designed to be unable to have babies with mixed spieces. You can leave a rabbit and a cat together all their lives and they will never produce offspring together. Even branches of the same spieces usually cannot procreate. There are rare instances of young from African and Asian elephants mating but it is highly unusual and all the big cats in Africa still retain their own sub spieces even living in the same environment.

In humans archeologists find linear development, Neandertal, Homo Errectus, Homo Sapien but they never find that missing link showing a smooth evolutionary transition from one group to the next.

My opinion is that the Earth was seeded at various times by animals as they are and that the emergence of new species is evidence of a new seeding.

Who did the seeding is another question.

Answer 9

Religion offers no logical explanations for the scientific things we know to be true. Genesis was written by a handicapped drunken sailor from the choppy short sentences and use of language.

Answer 10

Evolution is the truth. If you are interested in spirituality and want to know the meaning of life why don't you read Sri Aurobindo?