2006-10-21 23:12:01 · 21 answers · asked by pondo25 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
No. This is because the very concept of "stink" is subjective, to whoever is receiving the olfactory sensations.
It would still produce the same old smell-causing particles, but smells are not inherently bad - or certain domesticated animals certainly wouldn't go sniffing their noses into certain parts of certain other domesticated animals. That a smell can be 'bad' at all is, for the most part, a product of hereditary instinct or social influence.
2006-10-22 03:58:46 · answer #1 · answered by DoctorScurvy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but another point of view might query: If a dog crapped in the woods, wouldn't that be his/her right? Besides, what is stink to one is mushroom fertilizer to another.
2006-10-21 23:29:58 · answer #2 · answered by therealme 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it would still omit an odor for everything, regardless of nose or no to smell it, has an odor. Now the true question is, does the human mind have the capacity to truly grasp that which is the truth: that regardless of speci all sh!t stinks?
2006-10-21 23:16:38 · answer #3 · answered by lill_ice_angel2000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The dog or the poo? Well I think both would stink anyway no matter where they are. Dogs aren't very clean. Things can smell, even when there is no one around. Odour & bacteria exist independent of our senses. It's egomaniacal to think the world revolves around us and that nothing really exists unless we are there to perceive it.
2006-10-21 23:57:23 · answer #4 · answered by amp 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. In third dimensional reality a rose is a rose is a rose. Just because a human may not be around to smell it doesn't mean it doesn't emit odor. It is part of the molecular structure of feces.
2006-10-21 23:16:07 · answer #5 · answered by LadyLgl 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Same as the tree falling in the woods, different corollary.
2006-10-22 00:01:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
what did the dog have to eat before the crap? that I think would answer the question.
2006-10-21 23:43:28 · answer #7 · answered by sexy me 123 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honey, it would stink no matter where he crapped.
2006-10-21 23:20:07 · answer #8 · answered by FL Girl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To stink there has to be a nose close by -so no.
2006-10-21 23:13:39 · answer #9 · answered by super stud 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The smell of the poo would still be existent. It's just that there no person there to label it as 'stinky'.
2006-10-22 02:27:12 · answer #10 · answered by xquasarx 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋