will george w. cut and run from Iraq.....especially with the elections looming?

Answer 1

Listen to the news once in a while. No. He has said this over and over and over. The Democrats are putting for the cut and run agenda. It might help if you remember that Pres. Bush is not running for office.

Answer 2

The administration has defined ‘cut and run’ in such a way, that whenever we do leave, we will, by definition, be cutting and running.

It will, therefore, be interesting to see how the administration spins it when they start to redeploy out troops. This will not happen before next month’s elections because it would cost the Republicans at the polls. However, the troops (at least most of them) have to be out before the 2008 presidential election or it will cost the Republicans any shot had holding that office.

Therefore, you can expect the Bush administration to begin its own cut-and-run within a few months after this election. Of course, they will not call it cut-and-run. They will call it something like a creative adjustment in tactics based on their successful flexible strategy to victory. It would be funny if it were no do tragic.

Answer 3

Probably.

There is already a down grade of talk. They are now calling it a Civil War, where foreign troops should not be involved.

My guess is that the talk will move more to Civil War and a slow withdrawal, with the National soldiers being trained more and more.

Once again the majority will move toward power; Saddams old party.

Provided the Oil price is negotiated successfully toward the USA, and they can gain Favoured Nation status in which there is a big arms deal. Then Bush will pull the troops out.

There will be a Peace Keeping and Training force, probably the poor old Brits.

Answer 4

first of all, do not use a be conscious like possibly in the front of murdered -you do not even hint at that until eventually you're particular! 2d, lots extra scrutiny and for lots longer time - he replaced into governor of Texas for 8 years and George H.W. Bush's son - son of a guy who might want to be both president and Vice-President -for a finished of 12 years - all his life. the present President Bush replaced into vetted - and -given anybody else operating, the yankee human beings beloved what they said and persisted to love it even extra at the same time as his re-election received by technique of a significantly better margint han the election. Yeah, he replaced into vetted -if Obama were vetted very nearly as a lot, we does no longer be searching on the travesty of a conceivable nomination and a conceivable Obama Presidency.

Answer 5

As some answers suggest it will not be'cutting and running' it will be called something palatable to the American public,strategic withdrawal perhaps!. 'Answergir' should realise that 'No' from a politician means nothing it is just a tactic and could change the next day or sooner. War with China 'M' then your problem and mine will be solved along with everyone else's as we will be in the nuclear cloud.

Answer 6

Bush (and PNAC) fully intend to set up a permanent U.S. Military base in Iraq believing our presence will stabilize the mideast, and provide for a more secure existence for Israel. Also, they want control of the oil, partly to keep it out of the fundamentalists hands, but primarily for profit's sake, as all the major players in Bush's administration sit on the boards of oil companies (and/or military defense contractors).

He will say whatever he has to, as he's already been doing, to calm his constituency. However, he will continue to push PNAC's agenda for U.S. military and economic global domination.

When Bush assumed the Presidency, the men who created and nurtured the world domination schemes of PNAC became the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department and the White House. On September 11th, when the Towers came down, these men saw their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy. Vice President Dick Cheney is a founding member of PNAC, along with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Defense Policy Board chairman Richard Perle. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz is the ideological father of the group.

It's not about politics, but about business. They are currently in the position to use the economic and military might of America to further their own business enterprise(s). In the coming years, as this becomes more apparent, America will come to realize the extent to which Bush has already changed U.S. laws (with the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act of 2006) protecting government from the citizens, and removing citizens protections from government, utilizing the scare-tactic of terrorism to pass legislations.

We are not leaving Iraq. In fact, keep your eye on North Korea. Regardless of what he's said, Bush wants an invasion there very badly. You'll have to read PNAC's own website for the details.

Answer 7

"Posturing". The Iraq war is still THE big issue in the November elections, and it is hurting his party in the polls. So he is trying to cut his losses at the polls by finally LISTENING TO OUR GENERALS NOW!!!! (Mind you at the polls--not in the loss of human life or he would have listened to them long before his polls dropped). Too bad he wouldn't listen before invading Iraq. Anyway, he's trying to pander to his public now to make it look like he no longer is "staying the course": that little war slogan of his is dragging the repubs down. The good part is that if he actually does direct a pull-out or significant reduction of our troops, less people will die there, ours and theirs.

Answer 8

Nah, he'll go to war with North Korea 1st, then maybe Iran and then China

Answer 9

he cant coz as compensation for the war which they where forced in to or 'forced' into which ever way you look at it, they are pumping oil... and to fully compensate they still have a nother year's worth of pumping, so unless the sitch realy escelates... no.

Answer 10

Hell no. He wouldn't pull from Iraq to stop WWIII. We are in there for the long hall and the situation is becoming grave and much worse.