English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

For Australia
http://www.cana.net.au/bush/global_warming.htm
World
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/index.html

2006-10-21 19:23:10 · answer #1 · answered by Robert A 5 · 0 0

So the terrific arguments so far have been unsubstantiated & beside the point (3% declare) and faulty & many circumstances debunked (800 twelve months lag). it somewhat is fairly unhappy. to handle the latter (back!), in the previous there has been a lag between temp and CO2 will boost. it somewhat is using the fact CO2 isn't the only reason for international warming. while there is yet another reason, it may deliver approximately a CO2 boost which will improve the international warming. despite if, the undeniable fact that CO2 isn't the well-known reason for international warming does no longer advise that CO2 can not be the well-known reason. it somewhat is a logical and scientific fallacy. Any contributor to international warming may be the well-known reason under the perfect situations. as a result, human beings burning massive quantities of fossil fuels is making CO2 the well-known reason. There are then feedbacks which incorporate an boost in atmospheric water vapor which additionally make contributions to international warming as a results of our greenhouse gasoline emission forcings. Sorry i did no longer answer your query Trevor, as a results of fact i'm no longer able to! for sure neither can all of us else. i admire the "as a results of fact i don't have self assurance it" solutions. Now it somewhat is credible!

2016-12-08 18:52:23 · answer #2 · answered by chaplean 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers