2006-10-21 17:20:34 · 26 answers · asked by lelo_cool_girl 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I would have to say Ashley.
BOTH are very smart women. And they BOTH dress to satisfy THEIR DESIRES, no one else.
Very independent and they create their own look.
2006-10-21 17:26:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Ashley.
2006-10-21 17:25:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't make it a habit to look lustfully upon broomsticks. And the only time they were ever cute, or even remotely talented, is when they were on Full House as infants and all they had to do was sit there and look cute for a paycheck... When they needed to start acting, they failed. They feed off of one another (no pun intended) one needs the other in everything they appears in because the little girl cutsie image makes up for the fact that they have NO ACTING SKILLS WHATSOEVER. The people who are dumb enough to buy these movies for their own entertainment are die-hard fans that see their bright shining faces and say 'awww!' without even paying attention to the fact that they suck.
2006-10-21 19:44:09 · answer #3 · answered by Rick R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly, he does have softer (extra female facial) good factors, yet i imagine he's extra constructive searching than the Olsen twins. i might want to opt to work out what he may seem as if with a diverse coiffure. perhaps the manufacturers will do something with it if he makes accurate 12. no longer that apparently undesirable, i'm in basic terms curious.
2016-12-05 02:24:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ashley Olsen, I like her long blonde hair.
2006-10-21 23:28:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are very strange girls! I really don't know which one is which, but I can't believe the way they dress. They go out with greasy, dirty hair. I'm sure they don't know what a comb is, or soap for that matter. They wear the biggest clothes with scarves and hats and layers of all different shades of neutral or black. Nail polish that is chipped. I could go on. I'm not sure what the attraction is to either of them really. I honestly think they both have issues. Sorry, just my opinion.
2006-10-21 17:35:24 · answer #6 · answered by Goddess Kitty 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ashley. She has a fuller face and less bony structure.
2006-10-21 17:34:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ashley...she's still eating. And I happen to like her 'red' hair.
2006-10-21 17:57:46 · answer #8 · answered by twin2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would have to say Ashley.. cause i think she is more beautiful than Mary-Kate... Mk is just skinny...
http://cache.boston.com/bonzai-fba/Reuters_Photo/2004/11/21/1101043792_7291.jpg
2006-10-21 18:25:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a good point
2016-09-19 15:07:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋