2006-10-21 16:45:08 · 15 answers · asked by Bruthaman 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
I am going to go on the limb and saying Oakland wins tommorow against Arizona. When was the last time a team went 0-16. Do you really expect Oakland to go winless the entire season? I think a team going winless as almost as tough as someone going undeafeated.
Arizona seems like what the doctor ordered for Oakland. I don't know why people are jumping on this Leinart and Arizona bandwagon. Got News for you bandwagoners!! 1 win 5 loss. There is no if's and but's about it. That monday night was the most pitiful way to lose a game.
Leinart is young and still learning. Rex had 5 great games and look what happened to him against awful arizona. Ok.. Leniart had 2 good games .. so what?
When you have a QB like Hasselback , Never Ever start Leniart. He will get his shares of Int's this year. Don't say not against oakland. But we(people from Chicago) never ever would of thought that pitiful team in Arizona will cause 6 turnovers against our #1 offense in NFL coming into that week. We looked at Arizona like people look at the raiders
2006-10-21 17:04:23 · answer #1 · answered by B E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hasselback. Seahawks are one dimensional with Alexendar out and they have the best wide receiving group in football. Hasselback very rarely puts up low fantasy numbers, unless he is playing Chicago. Leinart only has one start.
2006-10-22 00:31:05 · answer #2 · answered by David N 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have a choice, a safe choice (Hasselbeck) or risky choice (Leinart). Hasselbeck would be the safe choice since everyone knows he's a solid QB, he'll get you 200-250 yards and 1-2 TDs for sure against Minnesota. But, if you want to roll the dice, you can play the riskier Leinart who plays against Oakland and with Boldin and Bryant, might be able to have a HUGE day, but since he's still a rookie, you don't know for sure if he's going to make any more mistakes, plus he has a new offensive coordinator, and lots of question marks on the line. Risk vs. safe bet... if it were me, I'd go long ball and start Leinart.
2006-10-21 23:52:05 · answer #3 · answered by Paris P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hasselback.
2006-10-21 23:57:52 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. Answers 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hasselback, Leinert hasn't shown ability to close games.
He has too much belief in his "skills" like against the Bears, he was too sure they would win and that's why they lost
2006-10-22 10:46:11 · answer #5 · answered by d.lin1993 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leinart. He is playing the Oakland Raiders and Hasselback is playing the Vikings.
2006-10-21 23:51:10 · answer #6 · answered by Eaglesfan19 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is tough, Leinart has a good chance to put up huge numbers in this game, Fitz or no Fitz.......but Hasselback is the smart choice........I'd probably go with Leinart, but either way you have a really good QB in this week.
2006-10-22 00:15:45 · answer #7 · answered by raildog 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leinart! The cards are playing the Raiders. Unfortunatly for the Raiders, I think the Budweiser Horses play better D so I'd start Matt Leinart.
2006-10-21 23:57:33 · answer #8 · answered by rayking19 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, i would always start Hasselbeck over Leinart. I have Leinart too and wanna start him real bad this weekend, but without Shaun Alexander running, Hasselbeck is forced to throw more. With Deion Branch and D Jack, you gotta always start Hasselbeck really no matter who the matchup is against.
2006-10-22 00:26:10 · answer #9 · answered by dunknasty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hasselbeck.
AZ is missing one of it's top receivers with Fitz out this week. You are looking at a rookie QB. Also, Oakland has a crappy run D, but their pass D is close to being in the top 10 in passing yds against.
2006-10-21 23:56:39 · answer #10 · answered by suk_on_my_glock 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋