He did his victory dance 3 weeks after it started, on the carrier when he declared major combat was over. They obviously put more into planning that speech than the direction of the 'war' itself.
2006-10-21 16:38:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by SunDancer 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
properly, in accordance to Bush it isn't a failure because he done what he got down to do i.e. end dad's conflict with Saddam and get a huge foothold in the close to East the position the biggest oil reserves are. Pity any such enormous volume of US voters can't see with the help of their low-intelligence president's lies and deceits. yet i'm no longer blaming him on my own as maximum politicians international-huge are exceptionally a lot a similar and for the same motives. you are able to't truly degree the succes or failure of a conflict in words of body count number, you comprehend. It wasn't Bush's lies or truths that count number, nor the intend of the U. S. or any of their allies that count number. Its effects that count number and its a concepts too early to inform what the lengthy-time period outcome of the finished Iraq mess will be. I do believe idea that lengthy-time period consequences might want to correctly be disastrous as I completely agree that scuffling with terrorism with open military might want to and conflict isn't somewhat the answer. sufficient data of it international-huge, cutting-edge and historic.
2016-12-05 02:20:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Erika 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Remeber, Bush already declared the war in Iraq over a couple of years ago!
2006-10-21 16:34:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Hmmm....how many people are eligible for a draft? I think that this will be a long and drawn out war. I don't foresee an end anytime soon. So your guess is as good as mine.
2006-10-21 16:36:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by the_green_grass_horse 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
A better question is how many more events like 9/11 would you have been willing to ignore before you responded?
I hear the weather is nice this time of year in Afghanistan - hint.....hint.......
2006-10-21 16:37:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Not sure, but at this point can this ever be considered a VICTORY?? To those who have given their lives RIP. To those who are still fighting a battle that should never been started, thank you and I pray for your safe return home..SOON!!!
Best Wishes!
2006-10-21 16:35:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by poetic princess 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I HONESTLY don't care! If it takes 3,000 or 3,000,000 dead soldiers to win this war then I am 100% for it.
I support the troops and AMERICA ALL THE WAY!
2006-10-21 16:37:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Bush already said that another president would be handling the withdrawal.
2006-10-21 16:35:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Laughing Libra 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
in the name of freedom ,we all can die,no dance as freedom has no end.u,s,a troops are hero's,country's step to the plat and mad hatter bush will bash them to the stones of time,attack u,s,a ,one more time and response of swift death from master bush ,and republicans ,as the glory of freedom is strong.
2006-10-21 16:38:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by CIVILIAN 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Taking bets on American deaths? How morbid.
2006-10-21 16:36:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋