I mean really. For most people the choice happens when you decide to have sex with some one. When you get in a car you know the risks. When you get on an airplane you know the risks. When you have sex you know the risks... It would seem that, if you don't know the risks or aren't willing to accept the risks then you shouldn't do it.
2006-10-21 16:14:59 · 3 answers · asked by Bruthaman 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I think it's funny how you compare getting a disease to getting pregnant... As if you have no control over whether you get pregnant...
so the question remains. If you are choosing to have sex aren't you choosing to accept the consequences good or bad?
2006-10-24 08:04:47 · update #1
Yes, of course...but people in our society don't want to accept the consequences of their mistakes.
2006-10-21 16:21:29 · answer #1 · answered by crimethinker1984 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So you would ignore all the advances in medicine?
If you get malaria, you would not take the cure? "You knew the risks when you went to that place, you should accept the malaria as the consequence!"
Why inocculate kids against mumps or smallpox? "When you had the kid, you knew there were diseases! If you didn't want your kid to die of Rubella, you should have kept your legs closed."
condoms break, rythem method doesn't work and some people are just too poor to afford birth control. Should they not have sex?
2006-10-21 16:17:05 · answer #2 · answered by Mac Momma 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm pretty much anti-abortion, BUT...suppose i reason, out of my beliefs to try to keep some gallie from getting an abortion? did i not just excercise pro-choise? i chose to act on my beliefs. a pro-abortionist has beliefs every bit as genuine as my own.
2006-10-21 16:27:01 · answer #3 · answered by phtokhos 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋