No, Bush doesn't have enough common sense to regret anything. He's a arrogant, egotistical moron.
2006-10-21 15:58:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jan G 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush will regret nothing.
Replacing Rumsfeld wouldn't have changed anything unless he had been replaced in the planning stage.
2 years and 2 more months of Bush.
God help us all.
2006-10-21 16:04:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Rumsfeld has nothing to do with it. The Dems and media would have complained about the next person, regardless of the facts, just as they are doing today. (When I speak of the facts, I mean all of it, not just the negative).
2006-10-21 16:02:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, Bush is to dense for that. Besides Rumsfeld has attempted to resign twice and Bush wouldn't accept it.
2006-10-21 16:00:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you know Bush as well as I do, he'll never admit in regretting keeping Rumsfeld, not publicly at least.
2006-10-21 15:59:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by jaljcoki 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
History will prove you cry baby loser libs wrong. You all are angry because you have no power. If Clinton had really went to war. You would be backing him right up.
2006-10-21 16:25:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by carolinatinpan 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush is an idiot, he won't address it, unless the media expresses concern.
2006-10-21 16:02:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Visual Cliff 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, but he will find a way to blame Clinton.
2006-10-21 16:04:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Count 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wait...Bush, admit to a mistake?? NO, he will blame someone or something else...usually a democrat.
2006-10-21 15:58:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by fairly smart 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nope.
2006-10-21 15:57:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Pancakes 7
·
1⤊
1⤋