Then how is leaving magically going to make them go away?
If we leave won't it give the enemy more will to fight?
2006-10-21 15:31:23 · 14 answers · asked by John 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There were terrorists before the thought of invading Iraq was even conceived.
If by trying to give the Iraqi people the opportunity to form a government that answers to the people instead of the other way around is creating more terrorists, it should tell you everything you need to know about their agenda.
Their demand is clear:
Death to all infidels.
Convert to Islam ...... or die.
Personally, I don't prefer either option.
And there is a lot of truth that fighting them on their home turf is a hell of a lot better than in the streets of our cities and towns. And, sooner or later, we will have to fight them - or concede to their demands.
2006-10-21 15:57:57 · answer #1 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
iraq was weak and harmless when the US invaded in 2003. they had no affiliation with al qaeda and 9-11, and had no wmd's. so, we invaded, killed, and destroyed. its no wonder there are a lot of pissed off people in the middle east. many of these pissed off people are also living in poverty. so yeah, the situation in iraq has probably created more terrorists, or at least fanned the flames of terrorism in the middle east. i have not heard anyone ever claim that by the US leaving the terrorists would "magically go away." im not sure that leaving would be a good idea at this time but im damn sure we should never have invaded in the first place! it was utter stupidity!
2006-10-21 15:56:10 · answer #2 · answered by henri r 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. Iraq has created mmore terrorists due to the brilliant ideas of Bush and now there is no way out.
2006-10-22 06:24:03 · answer #3 · answered by JS 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you say 'presently after'. ask your self what it replaced into like before the invasion began. besides that.... why might want to we wrestle for yet another international locations liberation? To my way of questioning, a united states might want to be requested in the journey that they prefer liberation first & the certainly invaders who're there to promote liberty might want to opt to unencumber that united states. If our personal international locations leaders were difficulty-free in the naming of the invasion, it would want to were "operation take down hussein". the actuality is in the planning, my expensive. you want to make the effort to flick via some old newspaper's from 2001 - 2003.... This invasion replaced into unplanned..... at the same time as it replaced into time to abort the challenge, because "we had received", we couldn't go away the mess that were created. The mess replaced into created because the country were left and not using a pacesetter. no one to blame of an finished united states... Looting, Gang -Forming, mass overlook - i'm no longer declaring that Hussein did a astonishing job.... yet, a minimum of, the country replaced into policed. The U.S. might want to correctly be a impressive-means.... yet we shouldn't get that wondered with great-hero. The Invasion lacked the plan: 'what to do for administration after the present administration is taken down'.
2016-12-05 02:18:54 · answer #4 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
being there is giving them the will to fight,, the top 16 spy agencies in the USA determined that the Bush Doctrine and the war in Iraq had created more terrorists,, this is not simply a theory
2006-10-21 15:41:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The point is that we are seen as "occupiers" of Iraq and only fomenting more rebellion. The lack of a IUS post-war strategy has never been more apparent as more and more insurgent militias are being formed and more and more US soldiers, Iraqi soldiers and Iraqi men, women and children are being killed every day. This only fuels Iraqi resentment and makes terrorists out of people who weren't. How would you feel if members of your family were killed by US soldiers who mistakenly thought they were part of the insurgency???
Should we stay and have more of our own young people DIE because our government failed at a post-war strategy? The plan was to have the Iraqis trained to take over, setup their own democratic government and their own security forces. After 6 years the Iraqis STILL aren't independent. What do you suggest? That we stay until we have enough names of dead soldiers to build another wall like the one in honor of all of the soldiers who died in Vietnam.
2006-10-21 15:44:18 · answer #6 · answered by nquizzitiv 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No, WE are creating more terrorist by staying there.
There were no terrorist in Iraq because Saddam was paranoid. He would have had them killed. When we invaded Iraq, the fractions got aid from terrorist organizations. WE CAUSED THE PROBLEM. WE SHOULD HAVE STAYED IN AFGHANISTAN & GOT BIN LADEN.
With our policies, WE are giving the enemy more incentive to fight...
2006-10-21 15:35:48 · answer #7 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I'm not really sure where the magic terrorist stick is shaking these days, maybe its b/c uof us in Iraq, maybe its because the muslims haven't killed enough people in Africa, maybe its because Israel still exists, where does it stop?
2006-10-21 15:39:33 · answer #8 · answered by 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
US leaves,, Saddam gets off,,, takes over again
US warns Saddam never to disobey again,,,
2006-10-21 16:13:24 · answer #9 · answered by lakhgill91 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Duh, because if you leave, there is no reason and draw for potential terrorist recruits--the whole lure for potential terrorist recruits is to fight the "evil murdering American imperialists." When you take that factor out of the equation, you take away any reason for them to join these organizations and sacrifice their lives.
2006-10-21 15:46:06 · answer #10 · answered by Agenda Dog 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋