English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

very simple:

pay 600 billion to transplant Israel to nebraska in the US (this is probably the cost of the Iraq war by now). Every facility mimicked unto the state, and give it to the jews. Say that it was wrong of America to support Israel unconditionally in face of palestinian injustce---and destroy the jewish lobby---bring admiration and respect from the muslim world. Then give Israel to Iran, US military bases and palestine....in return ask the president of Iran to develope an alliance with Americca, to support America and allow its nuclear program but under suppervision of the US to make sure there are proper practices with this highly dangerous weapon called the nuclear bomb. Allow Iran to control Iraq. America apologizes for its mistakes and asks forgiveness--adds aid.

Middle east no longer hates america, no more injudstice from the outside. No terrorist threats. Jews are safe in America and have their land on this earth in america.

end of war on terror.



Then,

2006-10-21 15:29:40 · 7 answers · asked by jack d 1 in News & Events Current Events

this would also bring respect by the american people by standing up to the jewish lobby...and so would ir bring respect from europe, asia and russia...

this would help in our foreign policy...people respect those with balls ladies and gentlemen.

Then, you say to china and russia, that USA is no longer the world police...and that China should handle problems in their sector (such as north korea). Russia should handle problems in their eastern european countries, and europe their new poor anexed states.

USA would patrol south america and ensure economic stability and justice.

So, in effect, china and russia would share the burden of 'policing the world' for the greater good.

USA tells kim jong ill that if it ever sold a nuclear weapon and the ill fell on any of its allies or itself. It would nuke its entire country.

To show its seriousness...It would demonstrate a thermonuclear explosion a couple miles from the korean peninsula. No stupid costly invasion needed

2006-10-21 15:33:24 · update #1

Then through subtle negotiation with china...it would bring down north korea slowly through economic sanctions in the long run. Never giving any economic incentives again.

North korea neutralized.
Iran neutralized.

Final policy from the US before everything is peaceful:

any nuclear weapon that is blown up on an american city or an allie of america...those that are enemies of america or are most probable to have done the proliferation will pay the price...in full..

end item...world peace.

2006-10-21 15:37:16 · update #2

herman...put your anger in your mouth or have it eroded through some other orifice.

2006-10-21 15:40:02 · update #3

edster....

NO, africa would not be the RESPONSIBILITY OF AMERICA anymore...so that then everyone has someone to pinpoint and blame...It would be the responsiblity of Europe and russia...america would simply supply funds if necessary in any crisis.

Only south america would be north america's responsibility.

little kim will be handled in due course through sancitons...in time, he will fall. Only a hard stance from america, and leave the flirting to china, who is responsible of north korea and that gay ****** under his sector of the world.

America is not responsible for every single problem on earth. when we do try to help, everyone resents us, its time we put the burden on the rest of the superpowers.

2006-10-21 15:42:44 · update #4

third answerer:

That would destroy the global economy and usher 300 years of a futuristic dark age....that would not solve anything but would rather return everything to anarchy as the global economy to collapse. I do not concider to solve anything by my definition, you may have a different one, in that case, I disagree with you.

2006-10-21 15:44:21 · update #5

hahaha, millie...I would NEVER run for president. besides, I would never reach power before probably getting killed by the musad or the jewish lobby.

Furthermore, I am not interested in politics as it stands today, maybe in another 300 years, by which time I will be long dead.

I think the world will go to a socialist-capitalist-meritocratic-democratic system of global economics.

People will rise to power through SAT type qualifications...and some just through charm and other characteristics such as honor, nobleness, etc...then to keep them from corruption---you put in place effective checks and balances such as the three branches of goverment:

you do a good job, you get 30 million...you do a bad one or are found to be corrupt you are humiliated and probably killed. There are many many ways to implement checks and balances.

It would be an honor to be elected...and you would not have to worr yabout money...something the system in US today lacks.

So yea...I think

2006-10-21 15:52:24 · update #6

that however, the USA as it stands today, is one of the few goverments who actually have checks and balances...maybe not the best...but they at least have some, unlike the rest of the world.

They have the three branches and the media...maybe its a little complacent and gay, but its a good goverment...so as it stands, I would say America is a great goverment at this state of civilized evolution. We shall see what happens later.

2006-10-21 15:53:49 · update #7

mark m--

You seem like a very leftist person. But I will answer anyway:

America has been hypocritical, but to remedy the situation its very simple. Most people are resentful of America due to its power, but so will follow suit the other superpowers.

What we would do is extinguish American hatred by hammering the jewish injustice, and sharing the policing and dictating of world policy to the other powers in their sectors of the world.

This would shift common resentment toward America, toward Russia and China over time, and US can concentrate on militarization of space, and economic expansion rather than feeling a moral obligation to the whole planet.

2006-10-21 16:14:21 · update #8

For example:

if it were russia that invaded Iran or Iraq, the global scenario would be very different. Its the israelites that keep on pushing us to police the middle east, and its costing us more than what its worth....

so in essence, the leaders of our country, are doing decisions based on money donations for the party through the jewish lobby (which politicians are dependent on to get elected)....rather than doing decisions for the American people.

This is not in the interests of America in the future. It shows again, that lobbysts control America, rather than the people themselvs. Its economic representation, and power representation, rather than people and population representation.

However, I am not negating the America dictates world policy---this is a simple fact. And America will continue to dictate a lot of world policy in the near future. This is just something you have to live with. Eventually, yo uwill have russia or china to deal with as your superpower

2006-10-21 16:21:28 · update #9

and they will dictate down to you as well....in time...but that may be before area 51 takes over planet earth and an interdimentional empire is established on earth for a dozen hundred years..

2006-10-21 16:23:02 · update #10

In fact, I think America has been the most generous super-power in history....It was a very generous power. It's problem was its paranoia and over-reaction to attack from the outside.

I don't think the asians, especially China, will be nearly so generous or nice....They will talk down to us probably like we were ****...haver you ever seen chinese corporations? I think you will find eastern way of life a lot more....authoritarian than open-ended US politics.

Get ready for a cultural future shock...and I think by the time China takes over....the world will be missing their ol'pal america.

Actually what I really think will happen is that America and the rest of the world will reach a multicultrual state of a unified global market, and boundaries will disappear...but increased competition will eliminate many of the things we take for granted today. Quality of life will probably go down, even though standard of living may go up on average...

and I think, as I stated above. .

2006-10-21 16:30:04 · update #11

NASA and area 51 may unleash their rotational dynamics closed zero point energy system, and control earth once energy per person (power per individual) goes down and the populace of earth is easier to control--but maybe it will just be global interdependence and that will be it.

2006-10-21 16:31:08 · update #12

7th answerer

Oh...really?

Israel has a worse chance of surviving the next 20 years than it quadrupling its UN sactions violations relative to Iran. It already has twice the violations as Iran and four times that of Pakistan. Not to mention, the horrible human rights violations against pakistan and lebanon....

Fellow readers, read this and see what I mean:

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1919396.ece

They used phosphorous bombs to burn human flesh off innocent victims in Lebanon in order to "more effectively take out the target" ...these weapons have raised questions as far as human rights on more than one occassion....

The way, that Israel constantly, and brazenly, discounts the international community, and feels no re-percutions against its crimes against humanity, is outrageously disgusting...

and then they expect us to cry because of the holocaust?

read on the palestinian conflict as well, how they bulldoze and kill civilians like dogs

2006-10-22 16:53:13 · update #13

This is the reason for american hatred in the middle east, there is no escaping it, its a fact...due to our support of this amoral digusting conduct, yet condemn only arab injustice.....it is arbitrary and one sided, and quite frankly, unfair.

maybe the musad or jewish answerer will agree?

2006-10-22 16:54:35 · update #14

denegration and humiliation are not the only ways to settle a conflict, you disgusting rat.

2006-10-22 16:56:00 · update #15

my arguement is just as strong no matter what your dirty zionist tactics try to portray

2006-10-22 16:56:38 · update #16

7 answers

Well, I would go for that idea. Along the same line, we should have an Islamic politerical party just to show that we Americans are sincere.... Give them equal time on those Sunday morning programs.

What about little Kim... And those trouble African nations.... You need to work on this some more.

2006-10-21 15:38:30 · answer #1 · answered by Lab Rat 4 · 0 0

is this question a joke? The damage has already been done, and the american empire has proven indefatigably that they are the most dangerous nation on earth. get out of your bubble. americans have no reality, therefore no morality today. it is a giant corporation bent on keeping the status quo of one supreme empire that dictates world policy. there is nothing democratic about '1 empire'...furthermore, do you not believe that bush believes in a one party sytem. (the republican party) if bush were asked if the democrats should ever be in power, what do you think he would say. the 21st c is going to be a huge watershed in the usa. china will inevitably the next superpower...whereas amerca will undergo another era of division, internal conflict...(pred. 2060) ...1760s, revolution; 1860s, civil war; 1960s civil rights...america will be a mess in another 50 years...and it all began with bush and the pax americanas.

2006-10-21 23:04:42 · answer #2 · answered by Happier in China 2 · 0 0

I have a better solution that would only take 20 min.
And show the world what the nuclear bomb would do?
drop one on all the middle east.

2006-10-21 22:39:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hey ..... I got a great idea too....

you can run and get elected for President.... you know it will be available in 2008, didn't you? Bush can't have 2 terms in a row...

let's see what you can do .... let's see how well you lead the country....

This would be your chance to show the world your superior solution....

2006-10-21 22:45:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Too long, boring, and rambling.

With that said, you have a better chance at "world peace" if the TeleTubbies ran the US government than your nonsense idea.

2006-10-22 18:43:29 · answer #5 · answered by BMCR 7 · 0 0

there is not a hope in hell of that ever happening. america medles and interfers to much in the world. go home and shut up!

2006-10-21 22:34:47 · answer #6 · answered by herman7spooky 2 · 0 0

only in a perfet world.sorry

2006-10-22 00:53:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers