Why is curing diseases and cancer not the top priority of mankind?

Answer 1

I bet if GW had spent the billions that he did on IRAQ on:
Cancer research, Heart attack , Diabetes research
as well as HEALTHCARE for all AMERICAN we could save more lives than Terrorism could ever reach.......not that I believe he entered IRAQ because of terrorism, tho' entering IRAQ created a breeding ground for terrorists. Does that perspective answer the question? I despise putting our dollars into endeavors that yeild no return...

Answer 2

Diseases are usually caused by living conditions, so until American citizens clean up there will be disease. Cure for cancer, it's been found but what to do with all the medical professionals without a job now?

Answer 3

Why is it that the extremely prosperous continually discover "a reason" and then pontificate at all of the working human beings approximately what greater they (the working human beings) can do? i realize it is solid PR, yet i think of it's time particular prosperous inner maximum electorate placed their money the place their mouth is. i do no longer understand the type you're in regard to this, so it is with the help of no potential a judgment on you. although, there are various human beings in comparable circumstances as you, with wealth and impact, who in basic terms think of that "giving their endorsement" to a reason is sufficient. properly, I even have heard that the nut interior the pit of a peach incorporates particular aspects which will easily attack maximum cancers cells interior the physique. it must be that the rationalization why maximum cancers is such a deadly disease is that few human beings understand there is a few thing fit for human intake contained in the peach pit. maximum persons see the peach pit and throw it away. I additionally understand that there has been somewhat analysis on the end result nutrition B12 has on maximum cancers. there's a e book titled, "international devoid of maximum cancers" with the help of G. Edward Griffin which addresses this particular subject in greater suitable factor. I even have not examine the e book myself yet am very attracted to doing so. So, how can we make the treatment for many cancers a international precedence? i think of the answer to that question is to greater efficient tell all international locations approximately how food and supplementations result the physique.

Answer 4

While curing diseases is, I believe, a top prority, one needs to ask WHOSE top priority it is. Surely those effected by it the most. This would envelope a majority of the Third World who really have limited economic clout. Those that have the economic clout see such investment as an economic DRAIN not an economic boom. Hence the $$ needed are spent elsewhere - primarily making us all better consumers.

Answer 5

Its more profitable killing people thats why. Havent you noticed that the DOW has reached an all time high ? Death and destruction is good for business, curing peoples diseases is only for bleeding heart liberals, something that the US doesnt like at all.

Answer 6

Too many are set on war and destruction. I know they are looking for a cure but the resources they could be using and what they are currently being given are very large in difference.

If mankind is so hell-bent on fighting one another, a cure will not save the planet.

Answer 7

Simple there is no money to be made by curing illness but there is plenty of money made out of the treatments no self respecting drug company is going to cure people there is no profit in that

Answer 8

Because there is more money in keeping a person sick!
A cure would eliminate the diseases entire industry

Answer 9

Because the planet is already over populated. Food is scare in many regions. Some people need to die, so others can live.

Answer 10

It should be, but Bush is in power. He is more worried about war, than healing mankind.