Why are liberals so worried about preserving our constitution?

Question

Then why do you numbskulls want to amend the second amendment for non lethal weapons, so that all of the criminals and terrorists will have guns, while the good man has nothing. The very thought of this is absurd. quit whining about constitutional rights if all you idiots want to do is change it for your own braindead purposes. NRA ALL THE WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 1

damn i hate libs i work with this big gay lib he said to me that liberals preserve the constitution i said what about the 2nd amendment he said we don't need that one anymore so much for preserving the constitution i love my guns like my Barrett 50.cal BMG rifle the libs have baned it in California but i don't care to much because California sucks i wish all the libs would move there they can have it they say its to dangerous they call it a terrorist weapon and that it could blowup a fuel storage tank i know it could but so could my M1 Garand 30-06 or they say you cant hunt with it well i do or they say stuff like people don't need a automatic or semi automatic to defend yourself well i do and i have both maybe they don't value their life as much as i value mine because if somebody is robing my house or is going to try to kill me they will **** themselves if i start spaying my Sten MK 2 sub machine gun at them

Answer 2

the overall public that adversarial it seem have not examine the Act. It applies to global calls. I somewhat have no longer started to hearken to of one man or woman who has had their calls from Grandma or all of us else monitored. it is a lot less complicated on your community Police branch to get a glance for warrant on your residing house from an nameless tip than it is for the Feds to invoke the Act. The Feds. might want to justify it to the court docket after this is use or any information collected will be brushed aside out of hand. i ask your self if the 3000 killed on 9-11, if given the prospect to have the Act used to ensure what replaced into going to ensue that day might want to say no.

Answer 3

Impossible to amend and amendment. Your premise is not factual. Your additional comments are not related to your question. By all means, follow the NRA and remain ignorant rather than seeking solution to a level of gun violence second to none among the nations of developed world and, of course, engage in name calling.

Answer 4

The constitution is what have been good for the American people all these years, but if/and when anyone the likes of Bush and Bushiters gets their way it will be pilgrims moving to get away from taxation without representation and freedom to practice their religion.

Answer 5

If you aren't worried about our constitutional rights being taken away you are the real dangerous people here not the ones who want our constitutional rights to remain the law of this land.

Answer 6

You are the poster child for numbskull. Look up the word preserve. The Constitution is on your side in this case.

Answer 7

An excellent question. Why would Americans ever want to preserve their consitution or their basic rights?

You're not a third world country any more. If you want security, try calling the cops.

Answer 8

You know asking a question and in doing so insulting the people your asking is not a very bright or mature thing to do. Maybe you might want to refrain from asking questions until you grow up a bit.

Answer 9

Why restrict it to guns only, huh? Why not accumulate the entire weaponry kit? Knives, bombs, viruses, guns, nuclear weapons, because hey! criminals can use any of those means to hurt you.


Please, the only good your gun will come into use is gathering dust in your attic.

Answer 10

1. Get your facts straight.
2. Those are activists not liberals. I am a far left liberal where being a true liberal means I stand by the constitution fully, unlike rightwingers that want to change parts of it to fit their beliefs. IE, prayer in schools and take a woman's right to privacy away by banning abortions.